BKTI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BKTI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −20 | ~15 | 20 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). On March 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund certain tariffs collected unde…
Customer demand and orders for our products were strong during fiscal year 2025 and continued during the first six months of 2026. Customer demand and new orders for our products was $18.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $18.3 million for the same period of fiscal ye…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, sales increased approximately 10.6% to approximately $23.4 million, compared with $21.2 million for the same period of fiscal year 2025. The increase was attributed primarily to the shipments of BKR series radio product and accessories sales. Gross profit ma…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, we recognized other income, net totaling approximately $174,000 and $19,000, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the pretax income totaled approximately $4.0 million, compared with pretax income of approximately $4.0 million for same period of fiscal year 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Customer demand and orders for our products were strong during fiscal year 2025 and continued during the first three months of 2026. Our backlog of unshipped customer orders was approximately $8.7 million and $14.2 million as of March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively. Changes in the bac…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, sales increased approximately 11.8% to approximately $21.3 million, compared with $19.1 million for the same period of fiscal year 2025. The increase was attributed primarily to the shipments of BKR series radio product and accessories sales. Gross profit m…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recognized other income, net totaling approximately $155,000. This compares with other expenses, net totaling $114,000 for the same period of fiscal year 2025.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the pretax income totaled approximately $3.4 million, compared with pretax income of approximately $2.8 million for same period of fiscal year 2025.
We recognized tax expense of $0.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026, and approximately $0.7 million for the same period of fiscal year 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice