BMEA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BMEA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −11 | ~14 | 66 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +15 | −12 | ~28 | 577 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Research and development expenses decreased by $21.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $10.7 million in external costs was primarily driven by a decrease of $3.1 million related to clinical activities, a decrease of $3.4…
General and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease of $0.9 million related to personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, due t…
General and administrative expenses decreased by $4.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease of $2.7 million related to personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, due to a …
Change in fair value of common warrant liability was $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, attributable to revaluation of the common warrants issued in connection with the June and October 2025 underwritten public offerings (…
Change in fair value of common warrant liability was $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, attributable to revaluation of the common warrants issued in connection with the June and October 2025 underwritten public offerings (see …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
General and administrative expenses decreased by $3.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease of $1.9 million related to personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, due…
Change in fair value of common warrant liability was $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $0.0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, attributable to revaluation of the common warrants issued in connection with the June and October 2025 underwritten public offerings (see No…
Gain on sale of property and equipment was $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $0.0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The gain in the current period was attributable to proceeds from the sale of laboratory equipment.
Interest and other income, net was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease of $0.1 million was primarily due to lower interest rates earned on cash and cash equivalents balance.
As of March 31, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $45.1 million and an accumulated deficit of $461.5 million. We have incurred substantial operating losses and have used cash in our operating activities since inception. Without any future financing, the current operating pl…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
legislative changes. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products.
and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to therapies considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not …
can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for any products we develop is also subject to approval.
We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and esta…
oversight, as well as adhering to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements. We may also be subject to significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and esta…
significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of any products we develop in certain countries. If we or any future collaborator fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets or fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, …
Many of the other biotechnology companies that we compete against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. They also may provide higher compensation, more diverse opportunities and better prospects fo…
high-quality candidates than what we have to offer. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success at which we can discover, develop and commercialize our product candidates will be limited and the potential for successfully growing our business will …
Our ability to develop icovamenib, BMF-500, BMF-650 or any future product candidates we may develop could be disrupted if our operations or those of our suppliers are affected by man-made or natural disasters or other business interruptions. Our corporate headquarters are located in California near …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice