BMY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BMY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +66 | −45 | ~19 | 27 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29
In 2026, we have achieved multiple regulatory approvals across our portfolio, including: (i) approval of our first CELMoD, Zenbexus (iberdomide), in combination with daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with MM who have received at least one prior …
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
Revenues increased 7% during the third quarter of 2026 and 5% year-to-date, primarily reflecting higher demand and higher average net selling prices across the Growth Portfolio and for Eliquis, which was partially offset by the impact of generics across the remainder of the Legacy Portfolio.
The $0.03 decrease in GAAP EPS for the third quarter of 2026 was primarily due to higher one-time Acquired IPRD charges in 2026 and the expiry of royalty income on diabetes products at the end of 2025, partially offset by lower amortization of acquired intangible assets and higher revenues in 2026. …
The $1.05 increase in GAAP EPS year-to-date was primarily due to lower amortization of acquired intangible assets, lower one-time Acquired IPRD charges and higher revenues in 2026, partially offset by the expiry of royalty income on diabetes products at the end of 2025. After adjusting for specified…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
In 2026, we made meaningful progress advancing our pipeline, highlighted by: (i) FDA acceptance of our NDA for iberdomide in RRMM with a PDUFA date of August 17, 2026; (ii) FDA acceptance of our NDA for mezigdomide in RRMM with a PDUFA date of May 13, 2027; (iii) positive interim Phase II results fr…
Revenues increased 6% during the second quarter of 2026 and 4% year-to-date, primarily reflecting higher demand and higher average net selling prices across the Growth Portfolio and for Eliquis, which was partially offset by the impact of generics across the remainder of the Legacy Portfolio.
The increase in GAAP EPS of $0.98 and $1.08 for the second quarter of 2026 and year-to-date, respectively, was primarily due to a one-time Acquired IPRD charge in 2025 and the impact of certain specified items, including lower amortization of acquired intangible assets, and higher revenues in 2026, …
EC approval of Opdivo in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (AVD), for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with previously untreated, Stage III or IV cHL.
Reductions/(increases) to provisions for product sales made in prior periods resulting from changes in estimates were $88 million and $67 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and $42 million and $331 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. The redu…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice