Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/BSPK/Filing changes

BSPK — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of BSPK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2025-11-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-08-27

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+17−13~27
Controls & proceduresNo paragraph-level changes0007
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors, Other information

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12

  • Results of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024
  • Sales during the three months ended September 30, 2025 were $467,945 compared to $277,471 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase in sales was a result of increased product sales of pre-rolled joints to licensed dispensaries in Colorado as well as increased joint production servi…
  • Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2025 was $233,770 compared to $162,476 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was a direct result of the increase in sales. The increase in cost of sales was due to increases in purchases of raw materials, packaging, an…
  • Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024 were $260,228 and $361,393, respectively. The decrease was mainly attributable to stock-based compensation of $10,496 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to $47,679 fo…
  • Results of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-08-27

  • Beginning January 1, 2025, we rebranded our product offerings in Colorado as The Joint Company.
  • Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024
  • Sales during the three months ended June 30, 2025 were $390,553 compared to $278,163 for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase in sales was a result of increased product sales of pre-rolled joints to licensed dispensaries in Colorado as well as increased joint production services for th…
  • Cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $193,054 compared to $172,046 for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The increase was a direct result of the increase in sales. The increase in cost of sales was due to increases in purchases of raw materials, packaging, and labor as…
  • Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 were $337,625 and $325,885, respectively. The decrease was mainly attributable to stock-based compensation of $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $59,855 for the three months ended J…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on BSPK

BSPK overviewBSPK quant ratingBSPK fair value (DCF)BSPK vs peersBSPK revenue historyBSPK AI deep research