CABO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CABO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +40 | −14 | ~35 | 42 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
(1)Amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 reflect $597.7 million of non-cash asset impairment charges. Refer to the section entitled "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Impairment Assessments" for further information. Amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 20…
(2)Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to "Use of Adjusted EBITDA" below for a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Passings represent the estimated number of serviceable and marketable homes and businesses passed by our active plant based on available information. We use an external reporting service for determining reported passings. The service provider generates updated counts biannually, during the first and…
We believe PSU, customer relationship and passings counts are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. Similar measures with similar titles are common measures used by investors, analysts and peers to compare performance in our industry, although our measures of PSUs, customer re…
Residential data service revenues decreased $16.7 million, or 7.3%, due primarily to a decrease in residential data subscribers.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
(1)Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to "Use of Adjusted EBITDA" below for a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Passings represent the estimated number of serviceable and marketable homes and businesses passed by our active plant based on available information. We use an external reporting service for determining reported passings. The service provider generates updated counts biannually, during the first and…
We believe passings, PSUs and customer relationship counts are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. Similar measures with similar titles are common measures used by investors, analysts and peers to compare performance in our industry, although our measures of passings, PSUs a…
(1)In March 2026, we sold certain fiber-to-the-tower contract rights for cash proceeds of $42.0 million. Such contracts generated $9.0 million of business data revenues during 2025.
Other revenues decreased $1.9 million, or 8.0%, due primarily to a decrease in regulatory and advertising revenues.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice