CAR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CAR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +13 | −11 | ~37 | 26 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-04
Non-vehicle related depreciation and amortization69 58 11 19%
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests16 1 15 n/m
Operating expenses increased to 47.2% of revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 43.0% during the similar period in 2025, primarily due to a favorable settlement distribution relating to our participation in the In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation recorded in 202…
(c)Consists of $1 million of expense and $109 million of income reported within operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the similar period in 2025, primarily due to decreased volume and a $1 million negative impact from currency exchange rate movements, partially offset by decreased selling, general and administrative costs.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests28 1 27 n/m
Net income attributable to Avis Budget Group, Inc.$35 $4 31 n/m
Operating expenses increased to 50.9% of revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 50.2% during the similar period in 2025, primarily due to increased facilities costs and decreased revenue, partially offset by decreased fleet operating costs. Vehicle depreciation and lease cha…
(c)Consists of $2 million and $1 million reported within selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively and $1 million and $11 million reported within operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA increased during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the similar period in 2025, primarily due to decreased vehicle depreciation and lease charges and selling, general and administrative costs, partially offset by decreased volume and a $1 million negative impact from cu…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice