CCZvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CCZ against SIC 4841 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZThis | — | — | — | — | -0.0%#5 | 23.5%#2 | 16.7%#1 | 22.3%#1 | 17.9%#1 | — | -0.7%#2 | — |
| ROKU | — | — | — | — | 15.2%#1 | 168.3%#1 | -0.1%#3 | 3.3%#3 | — | — | 53.8%#1 | — |
| CMCSA | — | — | — | — | -0.0%#5 | 23.5%#2 | 16.7%#1 | 22.3%#1 | 17.9%#1 | — | — | — |
| GLIBK | — | — | — | — | 3.0%#4 | -541.4%#6 | -33.2%#6 | -18.0%#4 | -15.4%#5 | — | — | — |
| LBRDA | — | — | — | — | 3.6%#2 | -407.9%#4 | -3.5%#4 | -71.4%#5 | -0.7%#3 | — | — | — |
| LBRDB | — | — | — | — | 3.6%#2 | -407.9%#4 | -3.5%#4 | -71.4%#5 | -0.7%#3 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 4841). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-08-02.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice