CELC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CELC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +82 | −94 | ~12 | 11 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
A Phase 1b dose-finding trial with an expansion portion for safety and efficacy evaluated gedatolisib when added to either the standard doses of palbociclib plus letrozole or palbociclib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. PI3K mutation status was not used as an eligibility criterion. P…
A total of 138 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC were dosed in the clinical trial. Four patients from this study continue to receive study treatment, as of March 31, 2026, each of whom has received study treatment for more than six years.
● 35 patients were enrolled in two dose escalation arms to evaluate the safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerable dose (“MTD”) of gedatolisib when used in combination with the standard doses of palbociclib and endocrine therapies. The MTD was determined to be 180 mg administered in…
● 103 patients were enrolled in one of four expansion arms (A, B, C, D) to determine if the triplet combination of gedatolisib plus palbociclib and letrozole or gedatolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant produced a superior objective response (OR), compared to historical control data of the double…
○ Arm A: ABC with progression and no prior endocrine-based systemic therapy or a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the metastatic setting. First-line endocrine-based therapy for advanced disease (CDK4/6 treatment naive).
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
A Phase 1b clinical trial (B2151009) evaluating patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer was initiated in 2016 and subsequently enrolled 138 patients. Four patients from this study continue to receive study treatment, as of September 30, 2025, each of whom has received study treatment for ap…
High objective overall response rates (“ORR”) were observed in all four expansion arms and were comparable in each arm for PIK3CA WT and PIK3CA MT patients. In patients who received prior hormonal therapy alone or in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor (Arms B, C, and D), the ORR (including unconfi…
Median progression-free survival (“PFS”) was 12.9 months for patients who received a prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor and were treated in the study with the Phase 3 dosing schedule (Arm D). For all treatment naïve patients who received gedatolisib combined with palbociclib plus letrozole in Expansion Arm A a…
Gedatolisib combined with palbociclib and endocrine therapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile with manageable toxicity. The majority of treatment related AEs were Grades 1 and 2. The most frequently observed AEs included stomatitis/mucosal inflammation, the majority of which were Grades 1 and …
In a presentation of results from the PIK3CA WT cohort of the VIKTORIA-1 study at the European Society for Medical Oncology (“ESMO”) Congress, additional data from a Phase 1b clinical trial that evaluated gedatolisib in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC was included. The analyses reported efficacy data fr…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2026. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securiti…
Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2026, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes to our system of internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our system of internal controls over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, referred to collectively herein as the Certifying Officers, are responsible for establishing and maintaining our disclosure controls and procedures. The Certifying Officers have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure contro…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financi…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
On June 13, 2025, Brightstone Venture Capital Fund, LP (“Brightstone”) adopted a 10b5-1 plan for the sale of up to 229,335 shares of Celcuity Inc. common stock beginning December 15, 2025 through December 15, 2026. This plan, along with a 10b5-1 plan that was adopted on December 13, 2024 for the sal…
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, none of our other directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice