CENN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CENN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +52 | −27 | ~24 | 52 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | −4 | ~4 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +3 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2026 were approximately $6.2 million, a decrease of approximately $0.2 million or 2.9% from approximately $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in net revenues in 2026 was primarily due to the decrease in vehicle sales of…
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we sold 563 ECVs, including 10 fully assembled Metro® units, 132 fully assembled Logistar™ 100 units, 14 fully assembled Logistar™ 260 units, 4 fully assembled Teemak™ units, 141 fully assembled Logistar™ 210 units, 11 fully assembled Logistar™ 450 units, 231 …
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we also sold 183 iChassis™ units, other than the 563 ECVs.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we sold 506 ECVs, including 7 fully assembled Metro® units, 122 fully assembled Logistar™ 100 units, 1 fully assembled Teemak™ units, 134 fully assembled Logistar™ 210 units, 11 fully assembled Logistar™ 450 units, 224 fully assembled Avantier™ units, 5 Antr…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we also sold 111 iChassis™ units, other than the 506 ECVs.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Additional units were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2026; we sold 57 ECVs, including 3 fully assembled Metro® units, 10 fully assembled Logistar™ 100, 3 fully assembled Teemak™, 14 fully assembled Logistar™ 260, 7 fully assembled Avantier™ units, 7 fully assembled Logistar™ 210 units,…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we also sold 72 iChassis™ units, other than the 57 ECVs.
Geographically, the vast majority of our net revenues were generated from vehicle sales in Asia during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, net revenues from Europe, North America, and Asia as a percentage of total revenues was 29.4%, 5.8%, and 5…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, net revenues from vehicle sales in Europe, North America, and Asia as a percentage of total vehicle net revenues was 48.9%, 10.4%, and 21.3%, respectively, compared to 33.1%, 9.5%, and 57.4%, respectively, for the corresponding period in 2025.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was approximately $0.2 million, a decrease of approximately $0.1 million or approximately 26.3% from $0.3 million of gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to lower vehicle sales volume and a decli…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On January 2, 2024, MHP Americas, Inc. (“MHP”), through counsel, sent a letter to Cenntro Electric Group Limited (“CEGL”) demanding payment allegedly owed by CEGL to MHP in the amount of $1,767,516.91 for unpaid invoices and $3,289,500 for total contract invoices and milestone payments for alleged b…
On April 10, 2024, CEGL filed a lawsuit against MHP for breach under the Master Consulting Services Agreement and SAP S/4HANA SOW by failure to properly implement the SAP S/4HANA globally as set forth in those contracts, and for breach of implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, causing CEG…
On March 4, 2026, American Quartz Group, Inc. (“AQGI”) filed an Unlawful Detainer action against Bison Motors Inc. (“Bison”) seeking possession of the premises. Bison subsequently filed a demurrer in response. On March 25, 2026, Bison filed a separate complaint against AQGI asserting claims includin…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
On July 3, 2025, Cenntro Electric Group (Europe) GmbH (“CEGE”) demanded the return of a EUR 180,000 rental deposit from its former landlord following the termination of a commercial lease on December 31, 2024. Without response from the landlord, CEGE initiated legal proceedings on July 22, 2025, by …
On January 2, 2024, MHP Americas, Inc. (“MHP”), through counsel, sent a letter to Cenntro Electric Group Limited (“Cenntro”) demanding payment allegedly owed by Cenntro to MHP in the amount of $1,767,516.91 for unpaid invoices and $3,289,500 for total contract invoices and milestone payments for all…
On April 10, 2024, CEGL filed a lawsuit against MHP Americas, Inc. (“MHP”) for breach under the Master Consulting Services Agreement and SAP S/4HANA SOW by failure to properly implement the SAP S/4HANA globally as set forth in those contracts, and for breach of implied covenants of good faith and fa…
On March 4, 2026, American Quartz Group, Inc. (“AQGI”) filed an Unlawful Detainer action against Bison Motors Inc. (“Bison”) seeking possession of the premises. Bison subsequently filed a demurrer in response. On March 25, 2026, Bison filed a separate complaint against AQGI asserting claims includin…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Regained Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement
On April 27, 2026, the Company received formal written notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) indicating that the Company has regained compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Bid Price R…
On July 22, 2026, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective July 20, 2026, in connection of the increase of the authorized shares of common stock from 16,666,667 shares…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice