CFOO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CFOO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +11 | −12 | ~5 | 14 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we generated revenues of $253. For the comparative three months ended March 31, 2025, we generated revenues of $41. There was an increase in revenue because of the increase in sales of wine products during the quarter.
Cost of Revenue. For the three months ended March 31, the cost of revenue was $24, and as a percentage of net revenue, approximately 9%, the cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $16, and as a percentage of net revenue, approximately 39%. The cost of revenue increased due to …
Gross Profit. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the gross profit was $229 and $25, respectively, the gross profit margin was 91% and 61%, respectively.
Operating Expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the operating cost was $61,827 and $103,766, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to effective cost control by management.
Other Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the total other income was $1 and $186, respectively. The total other income decreased due to less interest income during the period ended March 31, 2026 compared to the period ended March 31, 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Revenue. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company generated revenues of $96,828 and $239,083, respectively. For the comparative three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company generated revenues of $22,403 and $50,020, respectively. The increase in revenue was …
Cost of Revenue. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the cost of revenue was $87,958 and $214,628, respectively, and as a percentage of net revenue, approximately 91% and 90%. Cost of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $21,088 and $28,529, respecti…
Gross Profit. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, the gross profit was $8,870 and $1,315, respectively, the gross profit margin was 9% and 6%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, the gross profit was $24,455 and $21,491, respectively, the gross …
Operating Expenses. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the operating cost was $88,126 and $304,807, respectively, and while for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $111,984 and $318,454, respectively, the operating expenses decreased due to a decrease in admin…
Other Income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the total other income was $10 and $199, respectively and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $39 and $666, respectively, the other income decreased due to a decrease in receipt of bank interest income.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice