Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/CHDN/Filing changes

CHDN — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of CHDN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-28 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-29

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+43−34~2459
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed00~12
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~30
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————
Other informationText added/removed00~10

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-28

  • The Company announced on July 29, 2026 that it is exploring a sale of nine wholly owned regional gaming properties as part of a comprehensive review of the Company’s operational portfolio and long-term capital allocation priorities. These assets represent $280 to $300 million of annual Adjusted EBIT…
  • Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
  • Net income attributable to Churchill Downs Incorporated803842 40433272
  • Three Months Ended September 30, 2026, Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2025
  • •Net revenue increased $13 million driven by an $8 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment, a $2 million decrease from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment, and a $7 million increase from the Gaming segment.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29

  • Net income attributable to Churchill Downs Incorporated24121724 32429430
  • Three Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
  • •Net revenue increased $46 million driven by a $33 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment primarily due to a record-breaking Derby Week at Churchill Downs Racetrack, a $9 million increase from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment, and a $4 million increase from the Gamin…
  • •Operating income increased $30 million driven by a $21 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment primarily due to a record-breaking Derby Week at Churchill Downs Racetrack, a $4 million increase from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment, a $3 million increase from the Gami…
  • •Net income attributable to Churchill Downs Incorporated increased $24 million. The following impacted the comparability of the Company's net income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025: a $4 million after-tax decrease in transaction, pre-opening,…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on CHDN

CHDN overviewCHDN quant ratingCHDN fair value (DCF)CHDN vs peersCHDN revenue historyCHDN AI deep research