CHDN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CHDN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-22
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +36 | −16 | ~29 | 52 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
•whether the objective of a strategic alternative review process will be achieved; the terms, structure, benefits and costs of any strategic transaction; the timing of any strategic transaction and whether any strategic transaction will be consummated on the terms proposed or at all; the risk that t…
•Operating income increased $30 million driven by a $21 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment primarily due to a record-breaking Derby Week at Churchill Downs Racetrack, a $4 million increase from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment, a $3 million increase from the Gami…
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
•Net revenue increased $66 million driven by a $57 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment primarily due to a record-breaking Derby Week at Churchill Downs Racetrack, and an $11 million increase from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment. These increases were partially off…
•Operating income increased $38 million driven by an $36 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment primarily due to a record-breaking Derby Week at Churchill Downs Racetrack, a $5 million increase from the Wagering Services and Solutions segment, a $1 million increase from the Gam…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-22
•Operating income increased $8 million driven by a $15 million increase from the Live and Historical Racing segment and a $1 million increase in the Wagering Services and Solutions segment. These increases were partially offset by a $2 million decrease in the Gaming segment operating income, a $1 mi…
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026, Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
•Live and Historical Racing revenue increased $24 million due to a $17 million increase from our Kentucky HRM venues, a $5 million increase from our Virginia HRM venues, and a $3 million increase from our New Hampshire venues, partially offset by a $1 million decrease from Churchill Downs Racetrack.…
•Wagering Services and Solutions revenue increased $2 million primarily from our retail sports betting business.
•Gaming revenue decreased $5 million due to a $9 million decrease primarily from the cessation of HRM operations in Louisiana in May 2025 and a $2 million decrease primarily from our Florida and Mississippi properties. These decreases were partially offset by a $6 million increase primarily from our…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice