CIVB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CIVB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-08 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +31 | −51 | ~19 | 32 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~2 | 6 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Restated in full this quarter | +3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
risks related to the recent FSB Merger, including, without limitation, that we may be unable to integrate the business of Civista and FSB successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the FSB Merger or that the synergies attributable to the FSB Merger may vary from expectations;
the impact on our businesses, and the risks described above, of various domestic or international widespread natural or other disasters including severe weather events, pandemics, cybersecurity attacks, system failures, civil unrest, military or terrorist activities or international conflicts, inclu…
At the close of business on November 6, 2025, Civista closed its previously announced acquisition of FSB. The acquisition added approximately $268.1 million of total assets, $106.2 million of total loans and leases, $236.1 million of total deposits, and two branches. The 2025 results reflect inclusi…
Upon the closing of the acquisition, FSB was merged with and into Civista Bank. In addition, the management and organization structure was updated to reflect the combined organization. On-boarding of former FSB colleagues and their initial training was completed in the first quarter of 2026. Certain…
On July 10, 2025, CBI announced an underwritten public offering of up to a maximum of 3,788,238 of its common shares. CBI subsequently closed on the sale of 3,294,120 common shares on July 14, 2025, and the sale of an additional 494,118 common shares on July 16, 2025 pursuant to the underwriters' ex…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
risks related to the pending FSB Merger, including, without limitation, that we may not consummate the FSB Merger on the terms currently contemplated or at all; that the failure to complete the FSB Merger could negatively impact the price of our common shares and have a material adverse effect on ou…
our ability to appropriately maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as necessary to ensure the accurate reporting of our financial results;
On July 10, 2025, CBI and Civista entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with The Farmers Savings Bank, an Ohio-chartered bank headquartered in Spencer, Ohio (“Farmers”). Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the…
Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies, CBI agreed to pay $34.925 million in cash and issue 1,434,491 common shares, in aggregate, for all of the outstanding Farmers shares, subject to po…
Civista has received all required regulatory approvals for the FSB merger, which is expected to close in November 2025, pending approval by Farmer's shareholders and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The change in net portfolio value from December 31, 2025 to March 31, 2026, can be attributed to a couple of factors. The volume of assets and funding sources has changed, but the asset mix remains centered on loan and deposits. The volume of loans decreased while deposits increased, coupled with th…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
The change in net portfolio value from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025, can be attributed to a couple of factors. The volume of assets and funding sources has changed, but the asset mix remains centered on loan and deposits. The volume of loans and deposits has increased, while the volume of…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The disclosure below supplements and updates the risk factors previously disclosed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
CHANGES IN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR EARNINGS THROUGH DECLINES IN DEPOSITS, LOAN DEMAND, THE ABILITY OF OUR CUSTOMERS TO REPAY LOANS AND THE VALUE OF THE COLLATERAL SECURING OUR LOANS.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon local and national economic and political conditions, as well as governmental fiscal and monetary policies. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, changes in interest rates, fiscal and monetary policy, an increasing federal government …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice