CIVB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CIVB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +48 | −29 | ~19 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | ~1 | 6 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
aggregate net proceeds from the offering were approximately $75.7 million, after deducting $608 of direct expenses and the underwriting discount of $4.2 million. The net proceeds from the offering were initially used to pay-down short-term FHLB advances, but the long-term strategic plan is to use th…
Net charge-offs for the first six months ended June 30, 2026 totaled $790, compared to net charge-offs of $1,633 for the same period of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company charged off a total of 21 loans and leases, consisting of three Commercial & Agriculture loans totaling $9…
loan totaling $484, seven Consumer and Other loans totaling $20 and three Residential Real Estate loan totaling $30. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company had recoveries on previously charged-off Commercial & Agriculture loans of $96, Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occu…
Total deposits as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were as follows:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
risks related to the recent FSB Merger, including, without limitation, that we may be unable to integrate the business of Civista and FSB successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the FSB Merger or that the synergies attributable to the FSB Merger may vary from expectations;
long-term strategic plan is to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include supporting organic growth opportunities and future strategic transactions.
Net charge-offs for the first three months ended March 31, 2026 totaled $716, compared to net charge-offs of $633 for the same period of 2025. For the first three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company charged off a total of 12 loans and leases, consisting of two Commercial & Agriculture loans tot…
of $1, Residential Real Estate loans of $13, Lease Financing Receivables of $4 and Consumer and Other loans of $8. For each loan category, as well as in total, the percentage of net charge-offs to loans was less than one percent. Each of these factors was considered by management as part of the exam…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
During the second quarter of 2026, the Company enhanced its interest rate risk disclosure to focus on net interest income sensitivity rather than economic value of equity. Management believes that net interest income sensitivity better reflects the Company's near-term earnings exposure to changes in…
The following table provides information about the Company’s earnings at risk that were sensitive to changes in interest rates as of and June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, based on certain prepayment and account decay assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The table shows the changes…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that were sensitive to changes in interest rates as of and March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, based on certain prepayment and account decay assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The table shows the c…
The change in net portfolio value from December 31, 2025 to March 31, 2026, can be attributed to a couple of factors. The volume of assets and funding sources has changed, but the asset mix remains centered on loan and deposits. The volume of loans decreased while deposits increased, coupled with th…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice