CLH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CLH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −28 | ~23 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Income from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was $268.9 million and $387.8 million, as compared with income from operations of $210.3 million and $321.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. Net income for the three and six months ended Jun…
Adjusted EBITDA, which is the primary financial measure by which we evaluate the operating performance of our segments, increased $72.8 million, or 21.6%, from $336.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $409.0 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2026. Growth in Adjusted EBITDA versus the comparable period in 2025 was driven by a $54.7 million increase in SKSS segment Adjusted EBITDA and a $29.9 million increase in Environmental Services segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, Adjusted EBI…
Environmental Services direct revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2026 increased $104.5 million from the comparable period in 2025. Technical Services revenues increased $81.5 million. A PFAS-related filtration project associated with a large emergency response event earlier in the year con…
Environmental Services direct revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased $147.9 million from the comparable period in 2025. Technical Services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased $104.3 million. The PFAS-related filtration project referenced above contributed ove…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $118.9 million, compared with $111.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $3.8 million higher than the comparable period in 2025. Net …
Adjusted EBITDA, which is the primary financial measure by which we evaluate the operating performance of our segments, increased $13.0 million, or 5.5%, from $234.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $247.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026. Additional information re…
well as a $4.7 million increase in the SKSS segment’s Adjusted EBITDA. As a result of the growth discussed above, Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the Environmental Services and SKSS segments increased 50 basis points and 320 basis points respectively, which drove a 60 basis point increase in total Compan…
Environmental Services direct revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $43.4 million from the comparable period in 2025. Technical Services revenues increased $22.1 million from the comparable prior year period driven primarily by stronger volumes at our landfill facilities and h…
In the three months ended March 31, 2026, SKSS direct revenues decreased $15.7 million compared to the same period in 2025. Revenues from the sale of blended oil products decreased $12.3 million due to lower volumes sold. Revenues from the sale of base oil products decreased $9.3 million as lower pr…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our discl…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that was conducted during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to ma…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our discl…
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective as of March 31, 2026 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods s…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that was conducted during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to m…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice