CLPR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CLPR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −6 | ~18 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
As of June 30, 2026, the Company’s office property 250 Livingston Street was vacant as the City of New York vacated as of August 23, 2025. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to replace the City of New York as its tenant or will be able to replace it at comparable rents. Unt…
See note 4 to condensed consolidated financial statements, “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Throughout the first half of 2026 and all of 2025, we continued to benefit from relatively low interest rates on our debt. Our weighted average interest rate as of June 30, 2026, was approximately 4.2% per annum.
Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue. Residential rental income increased to $60,111 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $56,483 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to increases in rental rates and leased occupancy at all properties in 2026 and slightly lower bad debt expense. For example, base rent p…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
As of March 31, 2026, the Company’s office property 250 Livingston Street was vacant as the City of New York vacated as of August 23, 2025. The Company is currently seeking new tenants to replace the City of New York. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to replace the City o…
Throughout the first three months of 2026 and all of 2025, we continued to benefit from relatively low interest rates on our debt. Our weighted average interest rate as of March 31, 2026, was approximately 4.2% per annum.
As of March 31, 2026, we had $1,285,799 of indebtedness, net of unamortized issuance costs, secured by our properties, $26,083 of cash and cash equivalents, and $28,568 of restricted cash. See Note 4, “Notes Payable” of our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s property…
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $3,568 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $6,676 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to the Company having less cash collections at our commercial rental properties as a result the 250 Livingston vacancy desc…
Net cash used by investing activities was $1,925 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $9,680 used for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to decreased capital spending at the Dean Street development as it was completed in 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice