CMSvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CMS against Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund holdings — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMSThis | $20.8B#5 | 19.9x#2 | 2.1x#2 | 2.5x#1 | 13.5%#2 | 6.8%#2 | 20.8%#4 | 11.0%#3 | 4.8%#4 | — | — | — |
| NEE | $169.4B#1 | 20.6x#3 | 3.1x#5 | 6.6x#5 | 9.8%#4 | -1.6%#4 | 32.1%#1 | 12.4%#1 | 5.4%#3 | — | 18.8%#1 | 2.8%#3 |
| SO | $97.4B#2 | 22.1x#4 | 2.7x#3 | 3.3x#3 | 10.6%#3 | -1.4%#3 | 24.7%#3 | 12.1%#2 | 16.6%#1 | — | -2.7%#3 | 3.1%#2 |
| DUK | $92.1B#4 | 18.1x#1 | 1.7x#1 | 2.9x#2 | 5.6%#5 | 9.8%#1 | 27.2%#2 | 9.1%#4 | 5.7%#2 | — | 1.1%#2 | 3.6%#1 |
| CEG | $93.0B#3 | 25.7x#5 | 2.9x#4 | 4.1x#4 | 19.5%#1 | -38.1%#5 | 13.6%#5 | 7.3%#5 | 3.7%#5 | — | -17.7%#4 | 0.5%#4 |
Peer set: top holdings of XLU (Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund), the indexed fund holding this stock at its highest weight — a fund manager's grouping, not Tickwind's judgement. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice