CNOBP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CNOBP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +24 | −39 | ~30 | 37 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
The following table presents for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company’s average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity. The Company’s net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin are also reflected.
Noninterest income totaled $6.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared with $4.5 million for prior-year-period. The increase was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in BOLI income and a $1.3 million increase in deposit, loan and other income, which was partially offset by a…
Noninterest expenses totaled $57.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared with $39.3 million for prior-year period. The increase was primarily due to a $10.2 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, a $2.7 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses and a $2.…
Income tax expense was $14.7 million for the first quarter of 2026, resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.0%, compared to income tax expense of $7.2 million and an effective tax rate of 26.1% for the prior-year period. The increase in income tax expense and the effective tax rate was primarily du…
As of March 31, 2026, gross loans totaled $11.7 billion, an increase of $0.3 billion or 2.5% compared to December 31, 2025. The increase in gross loans as of March 31, 2026, compared to December 31, 2025, was primarily driven by organic growth in the commercial real estate portfolio, reflecting cont…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
Net income available to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $36.4 million compared to $48.9 million for the comparable nine-month period ended September 30, 2024. The Company’s diluted earnings per share were $0.83 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 as comp…
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $249.5 million, an increase of $64.5 million, or 34.8%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase primarily resulted from a 37 basis-point increase in the net interest margin to 3.04% from…
The following tables present for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity. The Company’s net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin are also reflected.
Average balances are based on amortized cost and include equity securities.
Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a 21% assumed tax rate.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice