CPF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CPF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-28 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +59 | −31 | ~49 | 70 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-28
•changes in management, directors, key personnel, organizational structure, compensation programs, employee benefit plans, or our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
During the three months ended September 30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $1.9 million, compared to a provision of $4.2 million during the same period of 2025. The provision for credit losses for the three months ended September 30, 2026 included a provision for credit …
The decrease in the provision for credit losses in the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared to the same period of 2025 was primarily driven by lower reserve requirements resulting from changes in portfolio composition and loan-level credit
characteristics. The decrease was also consistent with improved credit quality indicators, including lower nonaccrual loan balances. These favorable factors were partially offset by qualitative reserve requirements related to problem loan trends, and other portfolio-specific risks.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $8.6 million, compared to a provision of $13.3 million during the same period of 2025. The provision for credit losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 included a provision for credit l…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
•changes in our personnel, organization, compensation, and benefit plans;
deposits is a key component of interest expense, which significantly influences overall earnings. In addition, fees and service charges on deposit accounts, along with card interchange contribute meaningfully to other operating revenue.
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $4.4 million, compared to a provision of $5.0 million during the same period in 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $6.7 million, comp…
To supplement its consolidated financial information, the Company utilizes certain non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable GAAP results. The Company believes these non‑GAAP financial measures provide meaningful insi…
Non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies. The results for the three months ended June 30, 2026 were not materially impacted by items outside of the normal course of business.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice