CRMLWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CRMLW against SIC 1000 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRMLWThis | $235M#4 | — | — | — | — | 62.8%#5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BVN | $7.2B#1 | — | 2.1x#1 | 6.2x#2 | 40.4%#2 | 1928.1%#1 | 38.4%#1 | 11.9%#3 | — | — | — | 0.3%#1 |
| COBA | — | — | — | — | — | -269.7%#8 | — | -69.8%#5 | — | — | — | — |
| COPR.WT | — | — | — | — | -63.5%#4 | 40.1%#7 | -430.7%#4 | -27.3%#4 | -24.5%#2 | 5#2 | — | — |
| CRML | $828M#3 | — | — | — | — | 62.8%#5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DYNR | — | — | — | — | 25.7%#3 | 144.8%#4 | 16.5%#3 | 90.0%#1 | 64.7%#1 | 6#1 | — | — |
| EGMCF | — | — | — | — | — | 215.5%#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ERO | $2.9B#2 | — | 3.1x#2 | 3.7x#1 | 67.1%#1 | 485.1%#2 | 34.4%#2 | 28.2%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| FUST | — | — | — | — | -86.2%#5 | -602.9%#9 | -604.8%#5 | — | — | 1#3 | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 1000). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-11-06.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice