CRUSCIRRUS LOGIC, INC.vs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. against SIC 3674 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRUSThis | $5.9B#8 | 14.5x#1 | 2.7x#3 | 3.0x#4 | 5.3%#10 | 25.0%#10 | 23.0%#2 | 18.9%#1 | — | — | -3.5%#10 | — |
| RMBS | $9.3B#1 | 40.9x#5 | 6.7x#13 | 13.1x#13 | 27.1%#5 | 28.2%#9 | 36.8%#1 | 16.5%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| FORM | $9.0B#2 | 79.4x#7 | 8.1x#15 | 11.5x#12 | 2.8%#12 | -21.9%#12 | 7.3%#5 | 4.9%#5 | 4.6%#3 | 4#10 | — | — |
| VIAV | $8.6B#3 | — | 6.0x#11 | 5.7x#8 | 40.0%#2 | -187.4%#14 | 6.9%#6 | -2.1%#10 | 0.0%#6 | 5#6 | 183.8%#3 | — |
| AAOI | $8.6B#4 | — | 5.1x#10 | 18.8x#15 | 82.8%#1 | 79.5%#4 | -12.0%#14 | -2.3%#11 | -4.4%#8 | — | 249.5%#2 | — |
| SLAB | $7.4B#5 | — | 6.7x#14 | 9.4x#11 | 34.3%#3 | 66.0%#6 | -9.0%#13 | -5.9%#13 | -8.7%#10 | 6#3 | 56.0%#7 | — |
| MXL | $7.2B#6 | — | 14.9x#16 | 15.4x#14 | 29.7%#4 | 44.3%#8 | -27.1%#16 | -28.2%#14 | -23.3%#12 | 6#3 | — | — |
| ALGM | $6.3B#7 | 480.6x#9 | 6.5x#12 | 7.0x#10 | 22.8%#6 | 79.9%#3 | 2.1%#8 | -1.5%#9 | 1.7%#5 | 6#3 | 5.2%#9 | — |
| ENPH | $4.6B#9 | 34.3x#3 | 4.1x#6 | 3.1x#6 | 10.7%#9 | 67.7%#5 | 10.7%#4 | 15.6%#4 | 11.2%#2 | 5#6 | -9.7%#12 | — |
| AXTI | $4.6B#10 | 2317.7x#10 | 5.1x#9 | 51.6x#16 | -11.1%#16 | -82.9%#13 | -24.9%#15 | -2.4%#12 | -3.9%#7 | — | 1658.0%#1 | — |
| KLIC | $4.3B#11 | 37.5x#4 | 4.7x#7 | 6.5x#9 | -7.4%#15 | 100.3%#2 | -0.5%#10 | 0.0%#8 | — | — | 92.6%#5 | 1.3%#1 |
| DIOD | $4.2B#12 | 48.9x#6 | 2.1x#2 | 2.8x#3 | 13.0%#7 | 50.2%#7 | 2.4%#7 | 3.4%#6 | 1.9%#4 | 7#1 | 61.2%#6 | — |
| SYNA | $3.6B#13 | — | 3.9x#5 | 3.0x#5 | 11.4%#8 | -926.8%#16 | -5.6%#12 | -52.8%#16 | -5.1%#9 | 5#6 | 23.7%#8 | — |
| OSIS | $3.2B#15 | 22.3x#2 | 3.8x#4 | 1.8x#2 | 4.3%#11 | 3.4%#11 | 12.3%#3 | 18.6%#2 | 11.9%#1 | 5#6 | -17.9%#13 | — |
| IPGP | $3.3B#14 | 118.2x#8 | 1.5x#1 | 3.3x#7 | 2.7%#13 | 117.1%#1 | 1.3%#9 | 1.5%#7 | — | 7#1 | -6.2%#11 | 1.0%#2 |
| UCTT | $3.1B#16 | — | 4.9x#8 | 1.5x#1 | -2.1%#14 | -864.6%#15 | -5.2%#11 | -28.3%#15 | -10.9%#11 | 3#11 | 145.3%#4 | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3674). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-18.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice