DAICW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DAICW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +28 | −54 | ~17 | 13 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +4 | −2 | ~4 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +4 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +24 | −4 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Please read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this filing. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis, including information reg…
Our total revenue, cost of goods sold, gross profit, and gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 are summarized as follows:
Revenue decreased by $340,284, or (96.5)%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was comprised of subscription service revenue, while our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was…
Cost of goods sold decreased by $14,412, or (84.4)%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower service costs associated with third-party software licensing.
Our gross margin was 78.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to 95.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in gross margin is primarily attributable to changes in the mix of services provided during the periods.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial statements of S…
However, the driving force that will fuel our company is market growth. Our recent pivot to move most of our spending to Sales and Marketing shows a commitment to our go-to-market strategy. We recognize the need to increase adoption and expand brand awareness as we increase market share. This fiscal…
The Company accounts for transaction costs incurred in connection with the Business Combination that occurred in June 2025, and therefore transaction costs expensed were not a component of our results of operations during 2024. Costs that are directly attributable to the issuance of equity instrumen…
Prior to the Closing of the Business Combination, one lender elected to convert a portion of its outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock. In connection with the bridge loan conversion, the Company derecognized the liability, issued shares of Common Stock and recognized…
Comparison of Three and nine months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Accounting Personnel and Financial Reporting Controls. Management determined that the Company does not currently maintain sufficient accounting personnel and has not fully designed and implemented the processes and internal controls necessary to support accurate and timely financial reporting. These…
For the year ended December 31, 2025, management identified that the Company did not initially accrue all Board of Director compensation earned during the year ended December 31, 2025. During the year-end audit process, management recorded the appropriate accrual and related Board of Director compen…
In addition, management identified presentation revisions in the statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and the nine months ended September 30, 2025. Certain items were reclassified between operating and financing activities, including amounts related to short-term debt and …
Management evaluated the quantitative and qualitative factors associated with these matters and concluded that the corrections were not material to any previously issued annual or interim financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has reflected these changes in the affected prior-period financia…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Costs of Goods Sold. During the preparation of financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, management identified multiple costs that were improperly included in cost of goods sold in the quarter ended March 31, 2025, as well as for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, as…
Accounting Personnel and Financial Reporting Controls. Management also identified that the Company does not currently have adequate staffing in its accounting department and has not yet designed and implemented the appropriate processes and internal controls to support accurate and timely financial …
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings. Other than as described below, we are not currently a party to any litigation or legal proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of o…
The Company has been made aware of a complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by William Reny (“Plaintiff”), a greater than five percent (5%) holder of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, against SEE ID, Charles Maddox and Ed Nabrotzky, each a director of SEE ID, and Does 1…
The Complaint alleges, among other things, (a) breach of Plaintiff’s employment agreement, and an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in respect thereof, by SEE ID by (i) terminating Mr. Reny’s employment for “cause,” (ii) not paying Plaintiff certain compensation and benefits, (iii) not…
On October 23, 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss several causes of action and requested that the court dismiss all claims in their entirety. On December 15, 2025, the District Court of Clark County, Nevada denied the Company’s motion to dismiss with respect to the former employee’s claims …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm business.
We are not involved in any pending or threatened legal proceedings that it believes could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
The issuance of shares of our Common Stock to White Lion under the Common Stock Purchase Agreement will dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders.
We may sell up to $10,000,000 of our Common Stock to White Lion Capital, LLC (“White Lion” or the “Selling Securityholder”) under the Common Stock Purchase Agreement. The shares will be sold to White Lion at a discount to the then-prevailing market price. To the extent we sell shares to White Lion u…
It is not possible to predict the actual number of shares we will sell to White Lion under the ELOC Agreement, or the actual gross proceeds resulting from those sales. We may not have access to the full amount available under the ELOC Agreement.
On April 17, 2026, we entered into the Common Stock Purchase Agreement with White Lion, pursuant to which White Lion committed to purchase up to $10,000,000 of our Common Stock, subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Common Stock Purchase Agreement. The Common Stock that may …
Because the purchase price per share to be paid by the White Lion for the shares of Common Stock that we may elect to sell to White Lion under the ELOC Agreement will fluctuate based on the market prices of our Common Stock during the applicable pricing period for each purchase, it is not possible f…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Business disruptions could have serious adverse consequences on our future revenue and financial condition and result in losses that may not be covered by insurance.
Our operations, particularly our operations in Puerto Rico, could be subject to the impact of natural or man-made disasters or other business disruptions, which include, but are not limited to, earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, water shortages, wildfires and fires, blizzards and other extre…
Our wholly-owned subsidiary in Puerto Rico has been granted certain incentives under Act 60 (described below), and the validity of these incentives are conditioned on our continuous compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant.
Our Puerto Rican subsidiary has been granted various incentives under Act 60, including a reduced 1% income tax rate on its industrial development income and a 15-year exemption term from (i) December 23, 2024 for income tax purposes, (ii) January 1, 2024 for real and personal property tax purposes,…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice