DHCNI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DHCNI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-02 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +28 | −22 | ~55 | 61 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~10 | 7 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~3 | 32 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-02
(3)Triple net leased senior living communities include, beginning in October 2026, seven skilled nursing facilities with 807 units that were formerly under management agreements and transitioned to a triple net lease. These seven communities had NOI of $1,341 and $4,420 during the three and nine mon…
The following tables present key operating metrics of our portfolio as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025:
Three Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30,
Triple net leased senior living communities2.21 x1.85 x2.27 x1.85 x
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
The following tables present key operating metrics of our portfolio as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Triple net leased senior living communities2.19 x1.88 x2.22 x1.88 x
Triple net leased senior living communities2.19 x1.88 x2.22 x1.88 x
(1)Consists of properties owned, in service and reported in the same segment since April 1, 2025 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, and January 1, 2025 for the six months ended June 30, 2026; excludes properties classified as held for sale, closed or out of service, if any, planned dispositio…
(2)Includes two tenants who vacated on June 30, 2026, with an aggregate annualized rental income of $6,885 and leased square feet of 212,767. Excluding these two tenants, the annualized rental income and square footage with leases expiring in 2026 are $4,681 and 153,605, respectively.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-02
•Our ability to transition senior living communities on the expected timeline and/or with the anticipated transition costs,
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice