DLTH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DLTH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-09 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-12-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +20 | −26 | ~14 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-09
Net sales decreased by 4.0% over the prior year first quarter to $98.6 million;
Net loss decreased to $10.0 million in fiscal 2026 first quarter compared to the prior year first quarter net loss of $15.3 million; and
Adjusted EBITDA increased to $2.6 million in fiscal 2026 first quarter compared to the prior year first quarter Adjusted EBITDA of ($3.8) million.
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling relating to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"). Following the ruling, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other federal agencies issued additional guidance and took actions affecting the …
While we expect these expenses to increase as we continue to increase brand awareness and invest in infrastructure to support our business, we believe these expenses will decrease as a percentage of sales over time. Our shipping and handling expenses typically increase during the second half of the …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-17
Net sales decreased by 9.6% over the prior year third quarter to $114.9 million, and net sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2025 decreased by 9.4% over the first nine months of the prior year to $349.3 million;
Net loss of $10.1 million in fiscal 2025 third quarter compared to the prior year third quarter net loss of $28.2 million, and net loss in the first nine months of fiscal 2025 of $24.0 million compared to a net loss in the first nine months of fiscal 2024 of $38.1 million; and
Adjusted EBITDA increased to ($0.7) million in fiscal 2025 third quarter compared to the prior year third quarter Adjusted EBITDA of ($6.2) million, and Adjusted EBITDA in the first nine months of fiscal 2025 of $7.5 million compared to $6.1 million over the first nine months of fiscal 2024.
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance, as it provides a clearer picture of operating results by excluding the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating the effects of interest and depreciation costs and eliminating expenses that are not reflective…
We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated net income before depreciation and amortization, interest expense and provision for income taxes adjusted for the impact of certain items, including non-cash, restructuring expenses and other items we do not consider representative of our ongoing operating p…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice