DOUG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DOUG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +68 | −21 | ~16 | 42 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +7 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
Net income attributed to non-controlling interest— (48)48 (100)%— %— %
Revenues. Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, were as follows:
The increase in revenues, excluding revenues from the property management business, was primarily due to an increase in commissions and other brokerage income of $22,187, which was driven by an increase in revenues from existing home sales in Florida of $28,223, and $3,405 in the Northeast region, w…
Operating expenses. Our operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, were as follows:
Gain on disposal of property management business(408)— (408)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
Revenues. Our revenues were $214,333 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $253,403 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The $39,070 decline in revenues was primarily due to lower commissions and other brokerage income, which was driven by decreased existing home sales and reve…
Our revenues from commissions and other brokerage income were $211,881 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $241,143 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decline of $29,262. In the three months ended March 31, 2026, our commissions and other brokerage income generated from t…
Operating expenses. Our operating expenses were $231,844 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $258,752 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decline of $26,908 was due primarily to a decline in real estate brokerage commissions expense of $19,134 arising primarily from decl…
Real Estate Agent Commissions. As a result of a decline in our commissions and other brokerage income, our real estate agent commissions expense was $167,391 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $186,525 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, representing a decline of $19,134. R…
Development Marketing, which generally pays lower commission rates, during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2026, a higher percentage of our revenues was generated from locations (primarily Florida) which cu…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
The failure of third-party vendors or partners to perform as we expect or appropriately manage risks, or our failure to adequately monitor third-party performance, could result in harm to our reputation and ability to generate revenue.
We engage with third-party vendors and partners in a variety of ways, including strategic collaborations and the development and delivery of applications, employing key internal operational processes and critical client systems. In many instances, these third parties are in direct contact with our a…
If our third-party partners or vendors (or their respective vendors) were to fail to perform as we expect, fail to appropriately manage risks, provide diminished or delayed services to us or our customers or face cybersecurity breaches of their information technology systems, or if we fail to adequa…
The use of technology that incorporates AI presents various operational, regulatory and reputational risks and may lead to changes in our industry. If we fail to implement AI technology successfully or if any of such risks materialize, it may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We have integrated, and plan to further integrate, AI technologies in our business, including the launch of our proprietary intelligence business, Elius, and our adoption of Google Cloud technology. We expect these initiatives to improve our productivity and operating efficiency, reduce costs and cr…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice