DPZ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DPZ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-20 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-27
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −16 | ~33 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +6 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-20
The 2026 and 2025 second quarters referenced herein represent the twelve-week periods ended June 14, 2026 and June 15, 2025, respectively. The 2026 and 2025 two fiscal quarters referenced herein represent the twenty-four-week periods ended June 14, 2026 and June 15, 2025, respectively. In this secti…
MORE Sales: Global retail sales, excluding foreign currency impact (which includes total retail sales at Company-owned and franchised stores worldwide), increased 3.2% as compared to the two fiscal quarters of 2025. U.S. retail sales increased 2.3% and international retail sales, excluding foreign c…
MORE Stores: Global net store growth of 389 stores, including 45 net store openings in the U.S. and 344 net store openings internationally.
Excluding the positive impact of foreign currency, Domino’s experienced global retail sales growth during the second quarter and two fiscal quarters of 2026, driven by net store growth during the trailing four quarters in both our U.S. and international businesses. Overall, we believe our global ret…
U.S. same store sales increased 0.1% in the second quarter of 2026, rolling over an increase in U.S. same store sales of 3.4% in the second quarter of 2025. U.S. same store sales increased 0.5% in the two fiscal quarters of 2026, rolling over an increase in U.S. same store sales of 1.4% in the two f…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-27
The 2026 and 2025 first quarters referenced herein represent the twelve-week periods ended March 22, 2026 and March 23, 2025, respectively. In this section, we discuss the results of our operations for the first quarter of 2026 as compared to the first quarter of 2025.
Excluding the positive impact of foreign currency, Domino’s experienced global retail sales growth during the first quarter of 2026, driven by same store sales growth in the U.S. and net store growth in both our U.S. and international businesses. These factors, as well as gross margin dollar improve…
U.S. same store sales increased 0.9% in the first quarter of 2026, rolling over a decline in U.S. same store sales of 0.5% in the first quarter of 2025. The increase in U.S. same store sales was driven by both higher average ticket and higher customer transaction counts. International same store sal…
Revenues from U.S. Company-owned store operations decreased $9.5 million, or 10.4%, in the first quarter of 2026 primarily driven by the refranchising of the Maryland market in May 2025. This decrease was partially offset by higher same store sales.
U.S. Company-owned same store sales increased 1.5% in the first quarter of 2026 and declined 2.9% in the first quarter of 2025.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-20
Our directors and officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act (“Section 16”)) may from time to time enter into plans for the purchase or sale of Domino’s stock that are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act.
During the fiscal quarter ended June 14, 2026, the following Section 16 officers adopted a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as defined in Item 408 under Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act):
Sandeep Reddy, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, adopted a new Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement on May 27, 2026. The plan’s maximum duration is until March 12, 2027, and first trades will not occur until March 10, 2027 at the earliest. The trading plan, which is subject to certai…
Cynthia A. Headen, our Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer, adopted a new Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement on May 27, 2026. The plan’s maximum duration is until August 27, 2027, and first trades will not occur until August 31, 2026 at the earliest. The trading plan, which is subject …
The Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements described above were adopted and precleared in accordance with Domino’s Insider Trading Policy and actual sale transactions made pursuant to such trading arrangements will be disclosed publicly in future Section 16 filings with the SEC.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-27
During the first quarter ended March 22, 2026, none of the Company’s directors or officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K of …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice