EAT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EAT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-04-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-01-28
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −17 | ~60 | 41 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~1 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
•Restaurant labor was favorable 0.6%, due to 0.5% of sales leverage, 0.4% of lower hourly labor, 0.2% of lower manager bonus, and 0.1% of lower other labor expenses, partially offset by 0.4% of higher manager salaries and 0.2% of higher health insurance.
•Restaurant expenses were unfavorable 0.5%, due to 0.3% of higher repairs and maintenance, 0.3% of higher delivery fees and to-go supplies, 0.2% of higher rent, and 0.2% higher other restaurant expenses, partially offset by 0.5% of sales leverage.
(1)Other decreased primarily due to accelerated depreciation in the prior year as a result of management’s decision to abandon and replace certain equipment.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million as follows:
(1)Other decreased primarily due to accelerated depreciation in the prior year as a result of management’s decision to abandon and replace certain equipment.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-28
•Restaurant labor was favorable 0.3%, due to 1.3% of sales leverage and 0.1% of lower other labor expenses, partially offset by 0.6% of higher hourly labor driven by increased staffing levels and wage rates, 0.3% of higher health insurance, and 0.2% of higher manager salaries.
•Restaurant expenses were unfavorable 0.4%, due to 0.6% of higher advertising, 0.4% of higher repairs and maintenance, 0.4% of higher delivery fees and to-go supplies, 0.2% of higher workers' compensation and general liability insurance, and 0.1% of higher rent, partially offset by 1.1% of sales lev…
General and administrative expenses increased $6.6 million as follows:
Defined contribution plan employer expenses and other benefits0.4
General and administrative expenses increased $12.0 million as follows:
Market risk (Item 3)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-28
current interest rate on the outstanding balance of this variable rate financial instrument as of December 24, 2025 would result in an additional $0.2 million of annual interest expense.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
On March 4, 2026, Kevin D. Hochman, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the terms of the plan Mr. Hochman may sell up to 120,000 shares. …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-28
During the thirteen week period ended December 24, 2025, no director or officer adopted or terminated any Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice