EBMT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EBMT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +29 | −14 | ~21 | 37 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Comparisons of financial condition in this section are between June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.
Total assets were $2.13 billion at June 30, 2026, an increase of $19.48 million, or 0.9%, from $2.11 billion at December 31, 2025. Loans receivable, net increased by $39.06 million from December 31, 2025. Securities available-for-sale increased $3.98 million, or 1.4%, from December 31, 2025. Total l…
Securities available-for-sale were $285.68 million at June 30, 2026, an increase of $3.99 million, or 1.4%, from $281.69 million at December 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to purchasing activity of $15.19 million, which was partially offset by maturities, principal payments and call activi…
The following table includes the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by loan category:
Total loans increased $39.32 million to $1.56 billion at June 30, 2026 from $1.52 billion at December 31, 2025. The increase was attributable to increases in total commercial real estate loans of $21.67 million, total commercial loans of $14.48 million, total residential loans of $5.59 million, and …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Comparisons of financial condition in this section are between March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.
Total assets were $2.09 billion at March 31, 2026, a decrease of $14.52 million, or 0.7%, from $2.11 billion at December 31, 2025. Loans receivable, net increased by $207,000 from December 31, 2025. Securities available-for-sale decreased $6.81 million, or 2.4%, from December 31, 2025. Total liabili…
Securities available-for-sale were $274.89 million at March 31, 2026, a decrease of $6.80 million, or 2.4% from $281.69 million at December 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to maturity, principal payments and call activity of $3.89 million and a decrease in fair value of $2.72 million.
The following table includes the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by loan category:
Total loans, net increased $207,000 to $1.50 billion at March 31, 2026 from $1.50 billion at December 31, 2025. The increase was largely driven by an increase in total commercial real estate loans of $7.79 million, an increase in total residential loans of $4.99 million and an increase of $1.21 mill…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice