EBRCZ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EBRCZ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −14 | ~18 | 52 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-11
In June 2026, the Company completed a fully underwritten institutional placement to institutional and sophisticated investors (“Institutional Placement”), comprising: (a) an institutional placement to institutional and sophisticated investors (“Tranche 1”); and (b) a conditional placement to BCP3 Pt…
In June 2026, we completed a 1-for-2 accelerated non-renounceable pro rata entitlement offer, with an institutional and retail component, at a purchase price of A$0.38 per CDI (A$3.80 per share of common stock). Under the institutional entitlement offering, we issued 110,582,160 CDIs, representing 1…
·Clinical results. Publications of clinical results by us, our competitors and other third parties can have a significant influence on whether, and the degree to which, our products are used by physicians and the procedures and treatments those physicians choose to administer for a given condition.
Gross profit increased by $0.3 million, or 303.5% during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, resulting from an increase in sales volume and a higher average selling price. Our gross margin was positively affected and will continue to be affected…
Research and development expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 11.2%, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. Clinical expenses increased by $0.6 million as a result of higher expenses related to WiSE CRT post-approval study. Facility-relate…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
·Clinical results. Publications of clinical results by us, our competitors and other third parties can have a significant influence on whether, and the degree to which, our products are used by physicians and the procedures and treatments those physicians choose to administer for a given condition.
Gross profit increased to $0.2 million, or 100% during the three-month period ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2025, resulting from the FDA approval of our WiSE CRT System in April 2025. Gross margin was 7.8% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026.…
Contract manufacturing, materials & components 1,094 731 363 49.7%
Research and development expenses increased by $1.0 million, or 18.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $0.4 million increase in contract manufacturing, materials and components as a result of highe…
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $5.6 million, or 127.8%, during the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Personnel-related expenses including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation and certain fringe benefits increase…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice