EDVA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EDVA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-19 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −13 | ~2 | 11 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +1 | −7 | 0 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-Q to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to Splash Beverage Group and its subsidiaries.
Splash is a Nevada corporation that was historically seeking to identify, acquire, and build early stage or under-valued beverage brands that have strong growth potential within its distribution system. During the current fiscal year beginning January 1, 2026, Splash has moved away from beverages an…
As a result of its lack of meaningful sales in the beverage business, Splash is transitioning to the regulated wellness and cannaboid markets. The second quarter of 2026 marked an important strategic inflection point for the Company as management began repositioning Splash Beverage Group from a lega…
During the second quarter of 2026, the Company continued evaluating strategic alternatives designed to reposition its business for long-term growth. While Splash Beverage Group has historically operated as a branded beverage company, management believes the Company's public platform, industry relati…
As part of this strategic evaluation, the Company explored opportunities to expand beyond its legacy beverage portfolio through acquisitions, licensing arrangements and strategic partnerships involving cannabinoid wellness products and related health technologies. Although the previously announced p…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Splash”) is a Nevada corporation that was historically seeking to identify, acquire, and build early stage or under-valued beverage brands that have strong growth potential within its distribution system. Due to its lack of working capital and unsuccess…
As a result of its lack of meaningful sales in the beverage business, Splash is transitioning to the regulated wellness and cannaboid markets. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on our poroposed acquisition of Medterra CBD, LLC (“Medterra”).
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025.
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 were less than $0.01 million compared to revenues of approximately $0.07 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The $0.06 million decrease in sales is due to a decrease in our beverage sales of $0.06 million. In fact, we did not generate…
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2026 were less than $0.01 million compared to cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2025 of approximately $0.04 million. The $0.03 million decrease in cost of goods sold for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 is prima…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
The Company has included in Item 1A of Part 1 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). These Risk Factors are upda…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The Company has included in Item 1A of Part 1 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (“Form 10-K”), a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). In addition t…
We may be unable to maintain our listing on NYSE American due to existing or proposed continued listing requirements.
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American. The NYSE American imposes various continued listing standards, the noncompliance with which may result in the delisting of our common stock. For example, on April 29, 2026, the Company received notice from NYSE that the Company was not in compliance w…
The Company signed a non-binding Letter of Intent contemplating a merger with Medterra CBD, LLC on March 12, 2026. However, as of the date of this report the Company is still awaiting comments on a Merger Agreement which it sent to Medterra approximately three weeks ago. As such, as of the date of t…
Further, Section 1003 of the NYSE American Company also imposes other continued listing requirements that we may be unable to comply with. Notably, the rules provide that if the Company’s stock price trades at a “low price per share,” the NYSE American will delist us without a compliance period or o…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice