EEGI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EEGI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −7 | ~4 | 6 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were $14,033 compared to $22,364 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 which primarily consist of professional fees.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, professional fees were $6,000 as compared to $6,000 for the three months ended of June 30, 2025 consistent with the prior year period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, professional fees were $12,000 as compared to $12,000 for the six months ended of June 30, 2025 consistent with the prior year period.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company did not have any other income or expenses.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, professional fees were $6,000, a increase of $NIL as compared to $6,000 for the three months ended of March 31, 2025.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company did not have any other income or expenses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company had a net loss of $6,116 compared to the three months period ended March 31, 2025 of a net loss of $8,542.
As of March 31, 2026, we had no cash and a working capital deficit of $140,417 compared to a working capital deficit of $97,851 as of March 31, 2025.
For three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company had cash used in operating activities in the amount of $15,068 compared to $11,295 in the three months ended March 31, 2025. Net operating loss decreased to $6,116 as compared to net loss of $8,542 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Accounts…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice