Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/EFOR/Filing changes

EFOR — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of EFOR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-31

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+3−3~237
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed00~20
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~11
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————
Other informationText added/removed00~10

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-30

  • Consolidated gross profit declined 1.8 percent year-over-year. Gross margin for the third quarter of 2026 was 28.3 percent, a compression of 110 basis points compared with the third quarter of 2025. Gross margin for the Commercial Segment was down 130 basis points year-over-year. Contributing to the…
  • Commercial Segment revenues were approximately 70 percent of total revenues and were stable year-over-year. Revenue growth in TMT more than offset declines in Business Services, Financial Services and Healthcare, while Consumer and Industrial remained relatively flat year-over-year. Federal Governme…
  • SG&A expenses were $668.3 million, compared with $643.5 million in the first nine months of 2025. SG&A expenses in the first nine months of 2026 included $30.9 million in acquisition, integration, and strategic planning expenses, compared with $15.8 million in the first nine months of 2025. The incr…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31

  • Consolidated gross profit declined 3.0 percent year-over-year. Gross margin for the second quarter of 2026 was 28.3 percent, a compression of 40 basis points compared with the second quarter of 2025. Gross margin for the Commercial Segment was down 90 basis points year-over-year, primarily driven by…
  • Commercial Segment revenues were approximately 70 percent of total revenues and were down 0.2 percent year-over-year. From an industry perspective, the decrease was mainly attributable to revenue decline from clients across Business Services and Financial Services, partially offset by year-over-year…
  • SG&A expenses were $450.6 million, compared with $431.3 million in the first six months of 2025. SG&A expenses in the first six months of 2026 included $22.6 million in acquisition, integration, and strategic planning expenses, compared with $11.6 million in the first six months of 2025.

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on EFOR

EFOR overviewEFOR quant ratingEFOR fair value (DCF)EFOR vs peersEFOR revenue historyEFOR AI deep research