EIX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EIX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +146 | −117 | ~154 | 275 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): MD&A, Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29
Eaton Subrogation Settlementa settlement agreement entered into between SCE and an insurance claimant in the Eaton Fire litigation in September 2025
In the second quarter of 2026, Edison International completed the disposition of Trio, a former indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Trio's business activities have not been material to Edison International. See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1. Summary of Significant Accoun…
Three months ended September 30,Nine months ended September 30,
Net charges related to disallowed historical capital expenditures in SCE's 2025 GRC decision— (76)76 — (76)76
The decrease in SCE's core earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily reflected earnings recognized in the third quarter of 2025 upon implementation of the 2025 GRC final decision, which was retroactive to January 1, 2025, partially offset …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
In the second quarter of 2026, Edison International completed the disposition of Trio, a former indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Trio's business activities have not been material to Edison International. See "Results of Operations—Edison International Parent and Other—Trio" and "Notes to Condensed …
The increase in SCE's core earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same periods in 2025, was primarily due to the adoption of the 2025 GRC final decision in the third quarter of 2025. The increase for the six-month period was partially offset by the absence of a be…
•Losses of $36 million ($33 million after-tax) in 2026 related to the disposition of Trio, including Trio's operating losses, the loss on disposition, and related transaction and employee costs. See "Results of Operations—Edison International Parent and Other—Trio" and "Notes to Condensed Consolidat…
final decision and expected FERC capital expenditures, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—SCE—Capital Investment Plan" below and "Management Overview—Capital Program" in the 2025 MD&A.
In April 2026, the CEA submitted to the California Legislature and the Governor a report required by SB 254 that evaluates California’s approach to natural catastrophe risk, including wildfires. The report identifies increasing natural catastrophe risk driven by climate‑related factors, development …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice