Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/ESCA/Filing changes

ESCA — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of ESCA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-30

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+2−3~137
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~22
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29

  • Sales decreased 3.2% for the third quarter of 2026, compared with the same period in the prior year. Sales decreased primarily due to lower sales in our basketball, indoor games and table tennis categories against a prior year period that reflected tariff-related order timing. These decreases were p…
  • The effective tax rate for the three months ending September 30, 2026 was 22.7% compared to 22.0% for the same three month period last year. The effective tax rate for the first nine months ending September 30, 2026 was 22.9% compared to 23.2% for the same period last year.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30

  • MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  • Sales increased 6.2% for the second quarter of 2026, compared with the same period in the prior year. Sales increased largely due to increases in our archery categories, including the incremental contribution from our September 2025 acquisition of Gold Tip assets. Net sales also benefited from incre…
  • The effective tax rate for the three months ending June 30, 2026 was 22.7% compared to 25.8% for the same three month period last year. The effective tax rate for the first six months ending June 30, 2026 was 23.0% compared to 24.7% for the same period last year. The effective tax rate for the three…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on ESCA

ESCA overviewESCA quant ratingESCA fair value (DCF)ESCA vs peersESCA revenue historyESCA AI deep research