ETR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ETR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-02 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-31
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +350 | −260 | ~133 | 154 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +8 | −3 | ~4 | 5 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): MD&A, Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-02
Net income increased $71.4 million primarily due to higher retail electric price and higher volume/weather, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher interest expense.
Net income increased $53.8 million primarily due to higher retail electric price, higher volume/weather, and higher other income, partially offset by higher interest expense, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective January 2026 and the implementation of the Generating Arkansas Jobs Act rider effective June 2026. See Note 2 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2025 formula rate plan filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the Generating Arkansas Jobs Act rider filing.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in weather-adjusted residential usage.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
Net income decreased $13.8 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher interest expense, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by higher retail electric price.
Net income decreased $17.6 million primarily due to higher interest expense, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher taxes other than income taxes, and lower volume/weather, partially offset by higher retail electric price and higher oth…
The volume/weather variance is insignificant and primarily due to an increase in industrial usage, substantially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in demand from large industrial customers, primarily …
Total electric energy sales for Entergy Arkansas for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 are as follows:
See Note 12 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s operating revenues.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-02
Column 1 are subject to normal NRC inspection activities. Plants in Column 2, Column 3, or Column 4 are subject to progressively increasing levels of inspection by the NRC with, in general, progressively increasing levels of associated costs. Continued plant operation is not permitted for plants in …
In April 2026 the NRC issued a final significance determination and notice of violation for Grand Gulf, in which it finalized a “white” finding with “low safety significance” related to one of Grand Gulf’s emergency diesel generators, resulting in Grand Gulf’s placement in Column 2, effective first …
In August 2026 the NRC issued a final significance determination and notice of violation for River Bend, in which it finalized a “white” finding with “low safety significance” related to one of the service water pumps at River Bend, resulting in River Bend’s placement in Column 2, effective third qu…
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2005 the EPA issued its final Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) regulations that potentially could result in a requirement to install SO2 and NOx pollution control technology as Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to continue operating certain of Entergy’…
The Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) did not meet the July 31, 2021 SIP submission deadline, but subsequently submitted a final SIP to the EPA for review. The ADEQ reviewed Entergy’s Independence plant but determined that additional air emission…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
In April 2026 the NRC issued a final significance determination and notice of violation for Grand Gulf, in which it finalized a “white” finding with “low safety significance” related to one of Grand Gulf’s emergency diesel generators, resulting in Grand Gulf’s placement in Column 2, effective first …
In July 2026 the NRC issued an inspection report for River Bend, in which it identified a preliminary “white” finding with “low safety significance” related to one of the service water pumps at River Bend. The NRC is continuing its evaluation of the issue and is expected to complete its determinatio…
the NRC’s review results in a final “white” finding, River Bend would be placed in Column 2 and would remain in Column 2 until the satisfactory completion of an NRC supplemental inspection.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice