FCELB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FCELB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-02 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +127 | −102 | ~52 | 56 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | ~6 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −7 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-02
On June 22, 2026, the Company entered into a Capital Equipment Purchase Agreement (the “CEPA”) with Fit Energy USA LP (“Fit”), by its general partner, Fit US Inc. The estimated contract value of the CEPA totaled approximately $2.6 billion, across Phases 0, 1, 2 and 3. Pursuant to the CEPA, the Compa…
We expect to begin delivery of the initial phase (Phase 0) of 30 MW of generating capacity in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026.
Our revenues and cost of revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2026 of $33.0 million reflects a decrease of $13.7 million from $46.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Cost of revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2026 of $57.5 million reflects an increase of $5.6 million from $51.9 million f…
Our product revenues and related costs for the three months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
As outlined in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below, demand for our carbonate platform capacity continues to build alongside broader energy and infrastructure needs. In response, in May 2026, the Company started the execution phase of its plan to expand its carbonate manufacturing cap…
Comparison of the Three Months Ended April 30, 2026 and 2025
Our revenues and cost of revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Total revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2026 of $35.6 million reflects a decrease of $1.8 million from $37.4 million for the same period in the prior year. Cost of revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2026 of $48.5 million reflects an increase of $1.7 million from $46.8 million …
Our product revenues and related costs for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-02
Certain of our PPAs for project assets in our generation portfolio expose us to fluctuating fuel price risks as well as the risk of being unable to procure the required amounts of fuel and the lack of alternative available fuel sources. We seek to mitigate our fuel risk using strategies including: (…
Yaphank Project (through September 2028), six years of the twenty year PPA for our 14.0 MW and 2.8 MW Derby Projects (through October 2029), and for the initial four years of the Toyota project (through May 2027); and (iii) potentially entering into future financial hedges with investment grade coun…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
derivative will be remeasured to fair value quarterly with the resulting gains/losses recorded to other income/expense. The fair value adjustments for the three and six months ended April 30, 2026 resulted in gains of $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The fair value adjustments for the th…
Certain of our PPAs for project assets in our generation portfolio expose us to fluctuating fuel price risks as well as the risk of being unable to procure the required amounts of fuel and the lack of alternative available fuel sources. We seek to mitigate our fuel risk using strategies including: (…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-02
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2023 and discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under Part II, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Commitments and Significant Contractual Obligations—Outsta…
Due to the planned equipment upgrade to address performance issues encountered with the SureSource 4000 fuel cells utilized at the 7.4 MW project at the Navy Base in Groton, Connecticut (the “Groton Project”) and the cessation of electricity production at the Groton Project pending such upgrade (as …
service coverage ratio covenants under the Groton Senior and Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreements (the “Potential DSCR Defaults.”)
Specifically, on June 5, 2026, Liberty Bank, in its capacities as administrative agent and lender, Amalgamated Bank, in its capacity as lender, and Groton Holdco Borrower entered into a Waiver, Consent and Amendment Agreement with respect to the Groton Senior Back Leverage Credit Agreement (the “Sen…
In addition, on June 5, 2026, Connecticut Green Bank, in its capacities as administrative agent and lender, and Groton Holdco Borrower entered into a Waiver, Consent and Amendment Agreement with respect to the Groton Subordinated Back Leverage Credit Agreement (the “CGB Waiver”). Under the CGB Waive…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice