FEAVvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of FEAV against SIC 1400 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEAVThis | — | — | — | — | — | 49.1%#4 | — | -43.2%#3 | -91.7%#2 | — | — | — |
| ACRG | — | — | — | — | — | 67.6%#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLTH | — | — | — | — | -93.8%#2 | -48.8%#5 | -2322.3%#2 | — | -13309.0%#3 | 1#2 | — | — |
| ELBM | $51M#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ELVR | $587.0B#1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GAU | $460M#2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRO | $114M#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.8%#1 | — |
| HL.PB | — | — | — | — | 53.0%#1 | 798.6%#1 | 36.2%#1 | 12.5%#1 | 13.9%#1 | 8#1 | — | — |
| IBATF | — | — | — | — | — | 103.5%#2 | — | 0.4%#2 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 1400). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-08-04.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice