Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/GLDM/Filing changes

GLDM — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of GLDM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed00~710
Market risk (Item 3)No paragraph-level changes0001
Controls & proceduresNo paragraph-level changes0004
Risk factorsSome risk factors updated+4−200
Other informationText added/removed00~10

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

Risk factors

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04

  • You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2025, which could materially adversely affect GLDM, the value of the Shares and an investment in the Shares. Except as described below, there have…
  • GLDM's ability to create and redeem Shares, custody gold bullion and operate efficiently depends on continued market acceptance of the LBMA Good Delivery Rules, the Good Delivery List and related London gold market standards.
  • GLDM depends on the LBMA’s Good Delivery Rules, the Good Delivery List and related London market standards for the acceptance, transfer, custody and liquidity of gold bullion. Changes to the Good Delivery Rules, the Good Delivery List or other London market acceptance standards could adversely affec…
  • The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Trust and GLDM. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating resu…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05

  • You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes in our risk factors f…
  • The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Trust. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on GLDM

GLDM overviewGLDM quant ratingGLDM fair value (DCF)GLDM vs peersGLDM revenue historyGLDM AI deep research