GMED — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GMED's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −13 | ~9 | 13 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
The $7.3 million, or 2.9%, decrease in cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by Nevro amortization of inventory step up of $6.0 million in the prior-year period, with no comparable event in the current-year period. Additionally, there was a decrease in product c…
The decrease of $16.8 million, or 5.5%, in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily driven by a decrease of $19.0 million in employee-related expenses partially offset by an increase of $2.7 million in provision for litigation.
The decrease in restructuring costs of $11.6 million, or 85.6% was primarily due to lower employee termination benefit expenses related to the 2024 Synergy Plan and the 2025 Strategic Integration Plan in the current-year period. Refer to “Part I; Item 1. Financial Statements; Notes to Condensed Cons…
The $110.6 million decrease was due to the bargain purchase gain related to the Nevro Merger as of June 30, 2025, with no comparable event in the current period.
Other income/(expense) increased by $5.9 million, or 391.3%, primarily due to a $5.7 million increase in interest income.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
The $38.7 million, or 19.8%, increase in cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily driven by the cost of sales from Nevro products of $26.2 million, an increase in product cost of $4.0 million driven primarily by higher volume, and an increase in freight cost of $4.0 mill…
The increase of $55.0 million, or 22.6%, in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily driven by an increase of $46.1 million for Nevro expenses. The remaining increases include an increase of $8.1 million in employee-related expenses, an increase of $3.3 million in outside consultin…
The increase in restructuring costs of $5.2 million compared to the same period of the prior-year period was primarily due to higher employee termination benefit expenses from the 2024 Synergy Plan and the 2025 Strategic Integration Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the e…
The increase of $1.1 million was due to the measurement period adjustments related to the Nevro Merger as of March 31, 2026.
Other income/(expense) decreased by $1.1 million, or 16.4%, primarily due to $2.1 million of foreign currency loss in the current period compared to a $4.3 million gain in the same period of the prior year. The foreign currency loss was partially offset by a net increase in interest income of $3.8 m…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2026. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)…
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2026. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materia…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
On March 13, 2026, Keith W. Pfeil, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy the conditions under Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act. Mr. Pfeil’s Rule 10b5-1 trading plan has a term ending upon the earlier of (i) June 12, 2027 or (ii) the sale of…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice