GNVR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GNVR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −36 | ~13 | 5 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +11 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −4 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis conta…
Genvor, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Genvor Inc., is pioneering the development and commercialization of AI-accelerated peptide technology to address critical challenges across two markets: agricultural biologicals and human health and wellness. Management believes Genvor’s proprietary AI-ac…
The Company’s BioCypher platform encompasses multiple classes of engineered peptides designed to address distinct agricultural and human health and wellness challenges.
With respect to agriculture, antimicrobial peptides (“AMPs”) are intended to provide broad-spectrum protection against fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens that threaten crop productivity worldwide while nutritionally enhanced peptides (“NEPs”) are intended to optimize nutrient uptake and utilizat…
These peptide technologies are distinguished by their multiple modes of action and biodegradability, which are intended to significantly reduce the risk of resistance development that increasingly limits the effectiveness of conventional chemical pesticides. The Company’s solutions are intended to m…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not histori…
Genvor Incorporated (the “Company” or “Genvor” or “we”) was incorporated in Florida on September 26, 2018, as Allure Worldwide, Inc., and as of November 18, 2019, redomiciled to Nevada. On June 24, 2022, the Company changed its name to from Allure Worldwide, Inc. to Genvor Incorporated.
The Company’s subsidiary, Genvor Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 4, 2019, as Nexion Biosciences Inc. and on January 22, 2020, its name was changed to Genvor Inc. Genvor Inc. develops plant-based defense technology designed to help farmers achieve global food se…
During May 2019, Genvor Inc. acquired Nexion Biosciences LLC (“NBLLC”) from a founder for nominal consideration. NBLLC was formed in the State of Delaware on December 28, 2018.
The Company was originally formed with the intention of seeking to acquire the assets or shares of an entity actively engaged in business which generates revenues, in exchange for its securities. On January 11, 2021, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Genv…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2026, the end of the …
● Lack of oversight by independent directors in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures;
● Lack of functioning audit committee, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures;
● Insufficient personnel resources within the accounting function to segregate the duties over financial transaction processing and reporting and to allow for proper monitoring controls over accounting;
● Insufficient written policies and procedures over accounting transaction processing and period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this eva…
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasona…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
From time to time, we are subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our normal business operations. Except as set forth in the notes to our financial statements, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceedi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
From time to time, we are subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our normal business operations. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, except as set forth below.
On February 7, 2024, the Company filed suit against Justin Kimbrough and Prosperity Consultants, LLC, in the 14th Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-02022), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendants’ improper re…
On April 12, 2024, the Company filed suit against Richard Saied, in the 192nd Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-05442), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendant’s improper receipt of shares of Company common st…
On October 13, 2024, Judith Miller sent the Company a letter demanding payment for amounts she claimed she was owed under her prior employment agreement with the Company. The Company disputes the allegations in the letter and intends to defend itself as necessary.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice