GRNL — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GRNL's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2013-04-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2013-04-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +3 | −1 | ~3 | 52 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 39 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2013-04-05
. Three Months Ended Percentage Nine Months Ended Percentage
During the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, our operating expenses decreased from $19,639 to 16,347 respectively. The decrease was primarily a result of decreases in accounting, amortization and regulatory expenses. The decrease was partially offset by increases in bank charges, legal …
During the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, our operating expenses increased from $70,438 to 240,5720 respectively. The increase was primarily a result of increases in bank charges, consulting, legal and travel and entertainment. The increase was partially offset by decreases in account…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2013-04-05
Our operating expenses increased during the three and six months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily a result of increases in accounting, consulting, legal, marketing, and regulatory expenses. The increase was partially offset by decreases in amortization. The significant increase i…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice