HLITHARMONIC INC.vs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of HARMONIC INC. against SIC 3663 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLITThis | $1.2B#6 | — | 3.3x#9 | 3.3x#7 | -26.2%#15 | -96.9%#15 | 3.9%#6 | 0.3%#7 | 0.8%#4 | 5#5 | 9.6%#8 | — |
| QCOM | $198.1B#1 | 21.6x#3 | 40.3x#15 | 4.5x#8 | 13.7%#6 | -45.4%#12 | 27.9%#2 | 112.9%#1 | 30.6%#1 | — | 16.4%#7 | 1.9%#1 |
| MSI | $76.1B#2 | 36.2x#4 | 28.5x#14 | 6.5x#9 | 8.0%#9 | 36.6%#8 | 25.6%#3 | 80.6%#3 | 22.0%#2 | 7#1 | -2.8%#10 | 1.0%#2 |
| UI | $36.1B#3 | 37.6x#5 | 25.0x#13 | 11.0x#11 | 27.2%#5 | 34.9%#9 | 36.2%#1 | 66.7%#4 | — | 5#5 | -1.9%#9 | 0.5%#3 |
| ONDS | $4.2B#4 | — | 2.7x#7 | 83.0x#14 | 605.3%#2 | -250.9%#16 | -115.1%#12 | -8.5%#10 | -6.4%#5 | 5#5 | 20.9%#4 | — |
| VISN | $1.5B#5 | 0.2x#1 | 0.6x#2 | 0.8x#4 | 39.7%#4 | 823.8%#1 | 2.5%#7 | 91.1%#2 | — | 7#1 | -46.1%#14 | — |
| UMAC | $1.2B#7 | — | 3.1x#8 | 106.8x#15 | 101.2%#3 | 40.0%#7 | -224.6%#14 | -4.9%#9 | — | — | 110.8%#1 | — |
| BKSY | $931M#8 | — | 4.4x#10 | 8.7x#10 | 4.4%#10 | 22.8%#11 | -44.0%#10 | 0.0%#8 | -12.2%#6 | — | 18.6%#5 | — |
| BKTI | $269M#9 | 21.0x#2 | 5.2x#11 | 3.1x#6 | 12.5%#7 | 61.9%#4 | 18.6%#4 | 26.1%#5 | — | 7#1 | -3.2%#11 | — |
| AVNW | $264M#10 | 108.7x#6 | 1.0x#4 | 0.6x#3 | 1.2%#12 | 89.3%#2 | 4.4%#5 | 0.9%#6 | 1.3%#3 | 6#4 | -12.6%#12 | — |
| VUZI | $233M#11 | — | 11.0x#12 | 37.0x#13 | 9.1%#8 | 56.1%#5 | -517.6%#15 | -152.9%#14 | -605.2%#10 | — | 16.7%#6 | — |
| PRKR | $179M#12 | — | — | — | — | -48.7%#13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AIRG | $70M#13 | — | 2.4x#6 | 1.3x#5 | -14.6%#14 | 26.0%#10 | -16.4%#8 | -21.9%#12 | — | — | 23.1%#3 | — |
| WATT | $64M#14 | — | 1.6x#5 | 11.4x#12 | 633.1%#1 | 47.9%#6 | -177.9%#13 | -23.9%#13 | -107.3%#9 | — | 63.6%#2 | — |
| CMTL | $45M#15 | — | 0.9x#3 | 0.1x#1 | -7.6%#13 | -55.3%#14 | -27.8%#9 | -295.8%#15 | -105.2%#8 | — | -38.7%#13 | 0.4%#4 |
| KUST | $4M#16 | — | 0.1x#1 | 0.3x#2 | 1.7%#11 | 66.1%#3 | -79.1%#11 | -13.1%#11 | -18.8%#7 | 3#8 | -97.9%#15 | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3663). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-18.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice