ICFI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ICFI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −11 | ~13 | 25 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
Revenue. Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $474.5 million, which was comparable to the same period in 2025. The following were changes in revenue from our various client markets:
Energy, Environment, Infrastructure, and Disaster Recovery client market revenues increased $2.6 million, or 1.0%, due to increases of $6.1 million and $1.4 million from our commercial and international government clients, respectively, offset by decreases of $4.2 million and $0.8 million from our U…
Indirect and selling expenses. Indirect and selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 totaled $123.3 million which was comparable to the same period in 2025. As a percentage of indirect and selling expenses, indirect labor and related fringe benefit costs were consistent at 75.2% and…
Other expense. The change in other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to 2025 was primarily due to foreign currency expense in 2026 of $0.3 million compared to $1.6 million in 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Revenue. The decrease in revenue was driven by a reduction of $56.7 million from our U.S. federal government clients primarily as a result of terminated contracts during the first half of 2025 due to the Administration’s changing priorities and the actions recommended by the Department of Government…
Energy, Environment, Infrastructure, and Disaster Recovery client market revenues decreased $6.4 million, or 2.7%, due to a decrease of $11.3 million from our U.S. federal government clients, offset by increases of $2.8 million, $1.9 million, and $0.2 million from our commercial, international gover…
Indirect and selling expenses. The change in total indirect and selling expenses were due to decreases of $10.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, in indirect labor and related fringe benefit costs and general and administrative costs for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the sa…
Other expense. The decrease in other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to foreign currency expense in 2026 of $0.3 million compared to $1.0 million in 2025, partially offset by losses from disposal of assets of $0.5 million in 2026 associated with early exits from c…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice