ICUI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ICUI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −22 | ~23 | 73 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +5 | −3 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
In February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Administration lacked the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"); the U.S. Court of International Trade subsequently ruled that companies are entitled to seek refunds for tariffs previously p…
At the closing of the transaction on May 1, 2025, under the Agreement, we sold a 60% interest in the joint venture to OPF. The total sales price, inclusive of our final purchase price adjustments, was $211.2 million, of which we used $200.0 million of the proceeds from the sale to pay down a portion…
We present income statement data in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements." The following table shows, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the percentages of each income statement caption in relation to total revenue:
Selling, general and administrative expenses28 %29 %28 %27 %
Restructuring, strategic transaction and integration expenses4 %3 %4 %3 %
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
In February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Administration lacks the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"); the U.S. Court of International Trade subsequently ruled that companies are entitled to seek refunds for tariffs already paid …
We present income statement data in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements." The following table shows, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the percentages of each income statement caption in relation to total revenue:
Restructuring, strategic transaction and integration expenses3 %3 %
Loss before income taxes and equity in losses earnings of unconsolidated affiliates— %(2)%
There are no significant seasonal aspects to our business. We can experience fluctuations in net sales as a result of variations in the ordering patterns of our largest customers, which may be driven more by production scheduling and customer inventory levels, and less by seasonality. Our expenses o…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
(c) The following table shows any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K and intended to satisfy the Rule 10b5-1 affirmative defense, adopted, modified, or terminated by our directors or "officers" (as defined in R…
Name/TitleActionType of PlanAdoption DateEnd DateAggregate Number of Securities to be SoldPlan Description
Brian Bonnell, Chief Financial OfficerAdoptedRule 10b5-1 trading planJune 1, 2026June 1, 202724,535 Sale of vested time-based and performance-based restricted shares.
Virginia Sanzone, CVP, General CounselAdoptedRule 10b5-1 trading planJune 4, 2026June 4, 20274,856 Sale of vested time-based and performance-based restricted shares.
Other than as disclosed above, no other officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) or director of the Company adopted, modified, or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
(c) During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of the Company's directors or "officers" (as defined in Rule
16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified, or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" intended to
satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice