IDYA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of IDYA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −26 | ~23 | 40 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
We are also evaluating the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib in HLA*A2:01 positive (HLA*A2(+)), mUM patients in our ongoing, single-arm Phase 2 OptimUM-01 trial. We plan to present updated clinical data from this trial at the 2026 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress being …
Neoadjuvant UM. We are evaluating single-agent darovasertib in the neoadjuvant setting of primary UM, where the goal of treatment is to prevent enucleation (surgical eye removal), preserve vision prior to and post-plaque brachytherapy and potentially delay or prevent progression to metastatic diseas…
Adjuvant UM. In collaboration with our partner, Servier, we have initiated a global Phase 3 registrational trial (OptimUM-11) of darovasertib and crizotinib in the adjuvant setting of primary UM. The trial is expected to enroll approximately 450 primary UM patients with increased risk of metastasis,…
IDE849 is a potential first-in-class, DLL3 TOP1 ADC being evaluated by our partner, Hengrui Pharma, in a multi-site, open label Phase 1 clinical trial in China in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). Hengrui plans to provide a clinical data update from thi…
IDE034 is a potential first-in-class, B7H3/PTK7 bispecific TOP1 ADC. We are currently conducting a Phase 1 dose escalation trial and are targeting to provide a clinical data update by the end of 2026 or early 2027. Dosing of the first patient with IDE034 in the first quarter of 2026 triggered a $5.0…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
We are also evaluating the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib in HLA*A2:01 positive (HLA*A2(+)), mUM patients in our ongoing, single-arm Phase 2 OptimUM-01 trial. We have completed enrollment of approximately 100 patients in this trial and plan to present updated clinical data at a medical c…
Adjuvant UM. In collaboration with our partner, Servier, we plan to initiate a global Phase 3 registrational trial (OptimUM-11) of darovasertib and crizotinib in the adjuvant setting of primary UM in the first half of 2026.
We have successfully completed a Type C meeting with the U.S. FDA to align on the Phase 3 registrational design of the OptimUM-11 trial. The trial will enroll approximately 450 primary uveal melanoma patients with increased risk of metastasis, irrespective of HLA status, randomized 1:1 to treatment …
In August 2025, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Servier, for the development and commercialization of darovasertib outside of the United States. We received an upfront payment of $210.0 million and are eligible to receive up to $320.0 million in milestone payments, clinical trial…
Neoadjuvant UM. We are also evaluating darovasertib as a monotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting of primary UM, where the goal of treatment is to prevent enucleation (surgical eye removal), preserve vision prior to and post-plaque brachytherapy and potentially delay or prevent progression to metastat…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, no director or “officer” of the Company (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, no Section 16 officers or directors adopted or terminated contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase or sale of our securities.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice