IIPR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of IIPR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +75 | −89 | ~14 | 20 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
As previously disclosed, we entered into leases with PharmaCann Inc. and its affiliates for eleven properties. Effective February 1, 2025, rent under two cultivation facility leases in Michigan and Massachusetts, representing aggregate monthly base rent of approximately $1.3 million, was fully abate…
We regained possession of one retail property in Colorado through a default judgment and the property was subsequently sold in December 2025. PharmaCann has paid, and continues to pay, full rent on the remaining four retail properties in Colorado. In December 2025, we obtained a judgment in our favo…
of our annualized contractual rent. We continue to enforce our rights under the applicable lease agreements and pursue available remedies. See Note 6, “Investments in Real Estate,” to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.
On February 26, 2026, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “PharmaCann Settlement Agreement”) with PharmaCann Inc. (“PharmaCann”) to resolve pending lawsuits brought by certain indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company against PharmaCann and certain of its affiliates in conn…
In connection with the PharmaCann Settlement Agreement, the parties entered into consent orders, stipulations of judgment, and stipulations of settlement with the respective courts in Pennsylvania, New York, and Ohio (collectively, the “Consents”). The Consents provide for the entry of judgments in …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-04
•63795 19th Avenue in Palm Springs, California (pre-leased);
As discussed below under the section entitled “—Factors Impacting Our Operating Results—Conditions in Our Markets,” market dynamics in the regulated cannabis industry have been extremely challenging in recent years. These challenges include federal, state and local taxation burdens; ineffective enfo…
In March 2025, the Company launched a strategic initiative aimed at improving long-term financial performance by seeking to refresh a substantial portion of its tenant base with more financially viable, long-term tenants. As part of this initiative, the Company declared certain tenants and their aff…
for approximately 11.4% of the Company’s annualized contractual rent due as of September 30, 2025, owed $18.0 million, $4.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively, in base rent, property management fees, and estimated tax and insurance payments as of such date. The Company is actively pursuing its r…
Additionally, the Company previously declared a default under a secured promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $16.1 million (the “MIH Note”). The MIH Note was issued to the Company by the purchaser of four properties in California, and the MIH Note is secured by such four properties. …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice