ILPT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ILPT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +37 | −18 | ~32 | 35 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +3 | −10 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | ~2 | 26 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Occupancy data for our portfolio as of June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (square feet in thousands):
(3)During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we executed new leases for two previously vacant properties in Indiana and Hawaii totaling 2,770 square feet with commencement dates in May and July 2026, respectively.
The average effective rental rates per square foot represent total rental income divided by the average rentable square feet leased during the periods specified for our properties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the average effective rental rates per square foot of our pr…
Total leasing costs and concession commitments per square foot (1)
Total leasing costs and concession commitments per square foot per year (1)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
(1)Based on annualized rental revenues as of March 31, 2026.
Occupancy data for our portfolio as of March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (square feet in thousands):
The average effective rental rates per square foot represents total rental income divided by the average rentable square feet leased during the periods specified for our properties. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the average effective rental rates per square foot of our properti…
Other operating expenses. The decrease in other operating expenses is primarily due to decreases in repairs and maintenance expenses, other professional fees and insurance expenses, partially offset by increases in snow removal expenses at certain of our properties.
Interest income. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower cash balances and lower interest rates during the 2026 period as compared to the 2025 period.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
All of our $4,221,000 mortgage notes require interest only payments until maturity. Because our mortgage notes require interest to be paid at a fixed rate, changes in market interest rates during the terms of these mortgage notes will not affect our interest obligations. If these mortgage notes are …
Changes in market interest rates would affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt obligations. Increases in market interest rates decrease the fair value of our fixed rate debt, while decreases in market interest rates increase the fair value of our fixed rate debt. Interest rates continue to rema…
In May 2026, our consolidated joint venture repaid in full the Mountain Floating Rate Loan with the proceeds of a new $1,620,000 fixed rate mortgage loan and sold the related interest rate cap. As a result, as of June 30, 2026, we no longer have any floating rate debt outstanding or interest rate ca…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
(1)The annual interest rate is the rate stated in the applicable contract, as adjusted by the related interest rate cap.
The Mountain Floating Rate Loan requires that interest be paid at an annual rate of SOFR plus a weighted average premium of 2.77%. We are vulnerable to changes in the U.S. dollar based on short term interest rates, specifically SOFR. In conjunction with this borrowing, to hedge our exposure to risks…
The following table presents the approximate impact a one percentage point increase in interest rates would have on our annual floating rate interest expense at March 31, 2026, including the impact of our interest rate cap:
(1)Based on the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
(2)A one percentage point increase in interest rates would not have an impact on annual total interest expense for our floating rate debt because current interest rates exceed the strike rate of the related interest rate cap. However, a one percentage point increase in our annual interest rate of th…
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
•Our consolidated joint venture's ability to refinance its debt on the expected terms or timeline,
•Non-performance by the counterparty to our interest rate cap,
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice