JUNS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of JUNS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +31 | −14 | ~20 | 22 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +15 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On May 19, 2026, the Company and PharmAla Biotech Holdings Inc. (“PharmAla”) executed a non-binding summary of proposed terms (the “Term Sheet”) describing a potential licensing transaction pursuant to which the Company would acquire from PharmAla exclusive and perpetual U.S. rights to ALA-002, a pr…
On July 20, 2026, the Company and PharmAla entered into a definitive Strategic Asset License Agreement (the “License Agreement”). Pursuant to the License Agreement, PharmAla granted the Company an exclusive royalty-bearing, sublicensable (subject to restrictions on sublicenses to persons engaged in …
The Company will pay PharmAla an aggregate upfront payment of $3,333,333 (the “Upfront Payment”), comprised of (i) $1,500,000 in cash (the “Initial Cash Consideration”), consisting of a $600,000 escrow deposit made at the time of entering into the non-binding term sheet on May 19, 2026 and $900,000 …
The Company will pay PharmAla development milestone payments totaling up to $23,333,333, comprised of (i) $3,333,333 upon first dosing of the first patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial of a Licensed Product in the Territory (payable fifty percent (50%) in cash and fifty percent (50%), at PharmAla’s e…
The Company will pay PharmAla commercialization milestone payments totaling up to $73,333,333, comprised of (i) $10,000,000 upon first achievement of $333,333,333 in net sales in the Territory, (ii) $30,000,000 upon first achievement of $1,000,000,000 in net sales in the Territory, and (iii) $33,333…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Research and development (“R&D”) expenses were $411,049 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $466,745 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, representing a decrease of $55,696, or 12%. The decrease in R&D expenses was primarily attributable to reductions of $54,114 in clinical t…
As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,362,749. Our cash equivalents are held in high yield savings account. Since inception, we have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations. On March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $36,728,984.
Historically, we have financed our operations primarily by selling common stock and convertible debt. On October 24, 2025, the Company entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (“SEPA”) and related Registration Rights Agreement with YA II PN, Ltd. (“Yorkville”), providing the Company the righ…
On December 2, 2024, the Company priced its initial public offering of 2,750,000 shares of common stock at a price of $4.00 per share. The offering closed on December 4, 2024, and the Company started trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “JUNS”. The Company sold 2,750,000 shar…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we generated net revenues of $18,652 and $0, respectively from product sales and reported net losses of $2,061,958 and $1,528,867, respectively, and negative cash flow from operating activities of $1,432,100 and $1,063,041, respectively. As noted i…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
We have limited cash resources and will need additional financing to continue our operations; if we are unable to obtain sufficient capital, satisfy our obligations under our financing arrangements or consummate strategic transactions, we may be forced to significantly curtail or cease operations an…
Our current cash balance is not sufficient to fund our planned operations and satisfy our obligations for the next twelve months, and we will require substantial additional capital to continue operating our business. If we are unable to raise sufficient additional capital in the near term, we may be…
If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or consummate a strategic transaction, we may be forced to seek protection under applicable bankruptcy or insolvency laws or pursue a liquidation, dissolution, wind-down, or similar proceeding. In that event, holders of our common stock could lose all or…
The Company’s failure to meet the continued listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market could result in a delisting of its securities.
Our common stock is currently listed for trading on Nasdaq. On March 21, 2025, the Company received a written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq indicating that the Company was not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice