KD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of KD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +44 | −44 | ~12 | 30 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +12 | −9 | ~3 | 3 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Kyndryl is a leading provider of mission-critical enterprise technology services, offering advisory, implementation and managed service capabilities to thousands of customers in more than 60 countries. As the world’s largest IT infrastructure services provider, the Company designs, builds, manages a…
The Company is organized, managed and classified into four reportable segments by geography: United States, Japan, Principal Markets and Strategic Markets. For additional information on these segments, refer to Note 4 – Segments to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this rep…
*Revenue growth in constant currency and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial metrics. For definitions of these metrics and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, see “Segment Results” below.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we reported $3.6 billion in revenue, a decrease of 3 percent compared to the prior-year period. United States revenue increased 5 percent; Japan revenue decreased 8 percent, and increased 2 percent in constant currency; Principal Markets revenue decreased 7 …
Global markets have continued to experience volatility in 2026, amid ongoing trade tensions and heightened macroeconomic uncertainties, driven by geopolitical developments and conflicts, concerns over changes in global trade policies and the imposition of import tariffs by the United States, reactio…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-17
*Revenue growth in constant currency and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial metrics. For definitions of these metrics and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, see “Segment Results.”
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IBM in September 2021 to hold the operations of the infrastructure services unit of IBM’s Global Technology Services segment. On November 3, 2021, Kyndryl separated from IBM through a spin-off that was tax-free for U.S. federal tax pu…
Most economists, including the International Monetary Fund, expect positive but subdued global macroeconomic growth in calendar year 2026 amid ongoing trade tensions and heightened macroeconomic uncertainties. Global markets have experienced volatility from time to time in recent months, driven by g…
For the three months ended December 31, 2025, we reported $3.9 billion in revenue, an increase of 3 percent compared to the prior-year period. The revenue performance included a favorable currency exchange rate impact of three points. United States revenue was unchanged, Japan revenue decreased 2 pe…
platform (classified as a transaction-related benefit) in the prior-year period and $28 million of an after-tax transaction-related cost in the current period related to an interim arbitration decision on a pre-spin matter.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
As defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, a material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not b…
●The Company’s senior finance executives failed to set an appropriate tone at the top based on the principles associated with the control environment component of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) (the “COSO framewor…
These material weaknesses did not result in a misstatement of the Company’s previously issued historical consolidated financial statements. However, these material weaknesses could result in a misstatement that would result in a material misstatement to the Company’s annual or interim consolidated f…
On February 5, 2026, the Company appointed an Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim General Counsel and Interim Corporate Controller. In addition, the Company has appointed Andrew Bonzani as General Counsel and Secretary effective as of July 6, 2026, and Ellen Johnson as Chief Financial Officer e…
●enhanced disclosure controls and procedures related to communication and information sharing, by developing a more detailed reporting and internal review processes, evaluating opportunities for enhancement in our periodic disclosure processes and formalizing forums for additional discussions to fac…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-17
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The…
The Company identified the following material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting:
●The Company’s senior finance executives failed to set an appropriate tone at the top based on the principles associated with the control environment component of the COSO framework. Specifically, there was a lack of transparency with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Audit Committee of the…
The Company has appointed an Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim General Counsel and Interim Corporate Controller. In addition, the Company expects to make the following enhancements to its internal control over financial reporting to remediate the material weaknesses described above:
●provide updated training on disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including training courses on applicable federal securities laws for members of management;
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
As previously disclosed on a current report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2026, Harsh Chugh, the Company’s current Interim Chief Financial Officer, will be succeeded by Ellen Johnson as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, effective as of August 6, 2026, the day after the Company files this Form 10…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-17
As previously disclosed on a current report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2026, Maryjo Charbonnier notified the Company of her intent to retire from her role as Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company, effective as of March 31, 2026. Thereafter, she will remain an employee and serve as an Exe…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice