LFSTvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of LFST against SIC 8000 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSTThis | $5.4B#1 | — | 3.6x#2 | 3.8x#5 | 13.9%#6 | 116.8%#1 | 1.7%#2 | 0.6%#2 | 1.2%#2 | — | — | — |
| PNTG | $1.3B#2 | 37.7x#1 | 18.8x#3 | 1.4x#4 | 36.3%#4 | 31.1%#5 | 5.5%#1 | 41.6%#1 | 15.3%#1 | — | — | — |
| VSEEW | $1M#5 | — | — | 0.1x#2 | 40.3%#3 | 74.5%#4 | -65.6%#5 | — | — | 4#1 | -89.2%#2 | — |
| ATPC | $1M#6 | — | 0.1x#1 | 0.8x#3 | 15.2%#5 | 7.7%#6 | -213.7%#6 | -10.3%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| ALPS | $53M#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -65.6%#1 | — |
| EUDA | $30M#4 | — | — | 4.4x#6 | 70.0%#1 | 81.9%#2 | -36.3%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EUDAW | $55388#7 | — | — | 0.0x#1 | 70.0%#1 | 81.9%#2 | -36.3%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 8000). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-11-06.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice