LIMNW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LIMNW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −12 | ~12 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 3 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On June 3, 2026, we entered into a warrant exercise inducement offer letter (the “Inducement Letter Agreement”) with a holder of our existing common stock warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 10,344,000 shares of our common stock (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”), to exercise its Existing …
from the exercise of the Existing Warrants is approximately $1,861,921, before deducting financial advisory fees. The fair value of the Inducement Warrants was $2,211,295 at inducement, or $0.18 per instrument.
In connection with the transaction described above, we entered into a financial advisory services agreement, dated June 3, 2026, with Maxim, pursuant to which we agreed to pay Maxim for its services a cash fee of up to 8% of the gross proceeds received by us in connection with the exercise of the Ex…
The Warrant Inducement, which resulted in the issuance of the Company’s common stock in exchange for the cash exercise of the Existing Warrants, is considered a modification of the Existing Warrants under the guidance of ASC 815-40. The modification is consistent with the “Equity Issuance” classific…
On May 17, 2026, we entered into a Merger Agreement (the “Original Merger Agreement”) with InnocsAI LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“InnocsAI”), and NamChul Jung, in his capacity as the representative of the members of InnocsAI. Under the Original Merger Agreement, the aggregate considera…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
The following is a comparative of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
General and administrative expenses consists primarily of professional service fees, including accounting and legal services and other general operating expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $436,678 during the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months en…
Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred by InnoBation Bio Co, Ltd. (“Innobation”) who was performing the research and development activities for the Company in accordance with the license agreements with Innobation. Research and development expenses increased by $400,000 as a res…
The other expense, net decreased by $40,490 from $63,306 of other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $22,816 of other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The Company recognized interest expense of $18,638 on related party promissory notes during the three months ende…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice