LRHC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LRHC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-21 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-31
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +37 | −35 | ~17 | 61 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 5 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-21
On June 4, 2026, the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 with the SEC. On June 10, 2026, the Company received a letter from the Staff indicating that based on the June 4, 2026 filing of the Form 10-K, the Staff has determined that the Company comp…
On August 21, 2026, the Company received a notice from the Staff that the Company was not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of its failure to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2026 with the SEC. The Staff informed the Company that…
In February 2026, the Company entered into a contract to acquire a parcel of land in Osceola County, Central Florida, which was cancelled by the parties on May 15, 2026 upon mutual agreement.
In March 2026, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Consensus Core Technologies, Inc. (“Consensus”), along with certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries. In August 2026 the Company decided to discontinue pursuing …
On July 9, 2026, the Company filed respective Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
On February 5, 2026, Michael La Rosa resigned from the Board, and upon recommendation of the Nominating Committee, on February 10, 2026, the Board appointed Mr. Jaime Cosculluela as a member of the Board.
Convertible Note Facility, Redemption Agreement, and Series X Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
On November 12, 2025, the Company and the certain institutional investors (“Investors”) entered into the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to, among other things, issue and sell, and the Investors agreed to purchase, in multiple closings, …
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, on November 12, 2025, the Company and Mr. La Rosa entered into a redemption agreement (“Redemption Agreement”), pursuant to which, on the initial closing date of the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to redeem and immediately cancel and return to the s…
On January 8, 2026, the Company consummated the initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which it issued the Investors a senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $11,000,000 (the “Initial Note”), together with a previously issued Token Right…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice